2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00025-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of replacement of maize grain with wheat bran on the performance of growing lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
8
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wheat bran is used as a cheap energy source and maize grain is included to maximize the energy content of the supplement. Dhakad et al [23] reported lower ADG for growing lambs when wheat bran replaced cake at high level (75% wheat bran and 22% groundnut cake) and suggested a threshold level of 50% inclusion of wheat bran, a level that did not affect lamb growth adversely, on which the present proportion was based. Noug cake (29%) and maize grain (26%) is included to make metabolizable energy content of 11.94 MJ/kg DM and 19.2% CP to ensure maximum growth with least cost.…”
Section: Description Of Sheep and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Wheat bran is used as a cheap energy source and maize grain is included to maximize the energy content of the supplement. Dhakad et al [23] reported lower ADG for growing lambs when wheat bran replaced cake at high level (75% wheat bran and 22% groundnut cake) and suggested a threshold level of 50% inclusion of wheat bran, a level that did not affect lamb growth adversely, on which the present proportion was based. Noug cake (29%) and maize grain (26%) is included to make metabolizable energy content of 11.94 MJ/kg DM and 19.2% CP to ensure maximum growth with least cost.…”
Section: Description Of Sheep and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The dissimilarity in results on feeding WM may be partly attributable to the differences in the digestibility of the TMR when combinations of grain and forage were fed along with WM and due to the variability in the chemical composition of WM. Dhakad et al (2002), when evaluating the replacement of ground corn with WM in the concentrate for growing lambs, found that the digestibility of DM, OM, aNDF and ADF did not vary, indicating that the substitution of corn with WM at levels up to 100% did not alter the digestibility of fibre fractions. In a study, Cromwell et al (2000) recognized a greater variation in nutrients in grain Control, diet containing corn as the main grain source in total mixed ration; WM, diet containing wheat middlings as the main grain source in total mixed ration SEM standard error of mean (n=4 for each treatment) by-products than in feed grains and suggested more vigorous feed testing when by-products are used to ensure that ruminants are fed to satisfy nutrient requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The higher ADG could be ascribed to a lower proportion of wheat bran (69 vs. 79%) in their concentrate compared to our experimental diets and better quality vegetation during the season. Dhakad et al (2002) reported lower ADG for growing lambs when wheat bran replaced grain in the concentrate (75% wheat bran and 22% groundnut cake) and suggested a threshold level of 50% inclusion, a level that does not affect lamb growth adversely. The current result vis-à-vis the proportion of wheat bran used by Abule et al (1998) indicates that a threshold level may also apply to goats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%