2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of residual ocular spherical aberration on objective and subjective quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes

Abstract: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values for highorder aberrations were statistically higher in patients who received SN60AT lenses compared with SN60WF and Tecnis™ MF lenses. The results of this study were in agreement with the literature (11,26) .…”
Section: Chartsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean values for highorder aberrations were statistically higher in patients who received SN60AT lenses compared with SN60WF and Tecnis™ MF lenses. The results of this study were in agreement with the literature (11,26) .…”
Section: Chartsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies on the measurement of contrast sensitivity, aberrometry, and reading speed associated with objective measurement of visual acuity and satisfaction questionnaires provide an extensive evaluation of the optical quality and visual performance of implanted IOLs (11,22,25) . The contrast sensitivity results in our study are in agreement with the literature for different spatial frequencies: among patients using ReSTOR™ lenses, there was a decrease in contrast sensitivity at certain frequencies (12 and 18 cpd), while it remained normal at other frequencies (3 and 6 cpd) (24) .…”
Section: Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Do to their lack of optical correction, they do not provide a satisfactory depth of focus at varying distances. Despite the potential benefits of multifocal IOLs, their indications are still limited (10,11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Do to their lack of optical correction, they do not provide a satisfactory depth of focus at varying distances. Despite the potential benefits of multifocal IOLs, their indications are still limited (10,11) .More advanced multifocal IOLs aim to provide contrast sensitivity similar that accepted for monofocal IOLs and to induce minimal optical aberrations. However, the scientific literature reports a loss of contrast sensitivity and functional vision associated with photic phenomena that affect patient satisfaction (12,13) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%