2016
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/57/1/016005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of resonant magnetic perturbations on microturbulence in DIII-D pedestal

Abstract: Vacuum resonant magnetic perturbations (RMP) applied to otherwise axisymmetric tokamak plasmas produce in general a combination of non-resonant effects that preserve closed flux surfaces (kink response) and resonant effects that introduce magnetic islands and/or stochasticity (tearing response). The effect of the plasma kink response on the linear stability and nonlinear transport of edge turbulence is studied using the gyrokinetic toroidal code GTC for a DIII-D plasma with applied n = 2 vacuum RMP. GTC simula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
38
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We should note that the TM1 code does not include the non-resonant plasma kink response. While there has been consideration that the kink response can drive pump-out 37 and excite ballooning modes, 38,39 recent global gyro-kinetic simulations with the GTC 40 and XGC 41 codes do not show significant contribution of the kink response on finite-n ballooning stability and neoclassical cross-field transport for the low-collisionality plasmas studied in this Letter. This leaves the tearing response for which TM1 is well suited for performing analysis at ITER relevant resistivity and collisionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We should note that the TM1 code does not include the non-resonant plasma kink response. While there has been consideration that the kink response can drive pump-out 37 and excite ballooning modes, 38,39 recent global gyro-kinetic simulations with the GTC 40 and XGC 41 codes do not show significant contribution of the kink response on finite-n ballooning stability and neoclassical cross-field transport for the low-collisionality plasmas studied in this Letter. This leaves the tearing response for which TM1 is well suited for performing analysis at ITER relevant resistivity and collisionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We should note that the TM1 code does not include the non-resonant plasma kink response. While there has been consideration that the kink response can drive pump-out 37 and excite ballooning modes, 38,39 recent global gyro-kinetic simulations with the GTC 40 and XGC 41 codes do not show significant contribution of the kink response on finite-n ballooning stability and neoclassical cross-field transport for the low-collisionality plasmas studied in this Letter. This leaves the tearing response for which TM1 is well suited for performing analysis at ITER relevant resistivity and collisionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…When spacing between adjacent rational surfaces is not large (as with high n RMPs or high q 95 operation) it is important to understand why penetration at one rational surface may be sufficient, but a nearby rational surface is not. Answering this question will require further coupling of microscale fluctuation models with global transport models [56,20] to understand this critical spacing.…”
Section: Extrapolation Of the Rotation Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%