2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of response scale on assessment of emotional intelligence competencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the degree of agreement with the formulation of each element, on the original scale, the FSS-2, a Likert scale with five anchor points (1 to 5) [5] was used. However, reports have been submitted indicating that larger amplitudes of the scale appear to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the measurements [27,28,29,30,31], while other reports challenge the use of the central categories in these types of scales, such as 3 in the case of using a scale of 1 to 5, suggesting that it may affect both the accuracy of the measurements and the validity of the inferences made [32,33,34,35,36]. In addition, in our cultural field it is usual and widespread to use scales from 0 to 10 when almost any object or event has to be evaluated or assessed [37].…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the degree of agreement with the formulation of each element, on the original scale, the FSS-2, a Likert scale with five anchor points (1 to 5) [5] was used. However, reports have been submitted indicating that larger amplitudes of the scale appear to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the measurements [27,28,29,30,31], while other reports challenge the use of the central categories in these types of scales, such as 3 in the case of using a scale of 1 to 5, suggesting that it may affect both the accuracy of the measurements and the validity of the inferences made [32,33,34,35,36]. In addition, in our cultural field it is usual and widespread to use scales from 0 to 10 when almost any object or event has to be evaluated or assessed [37].…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each competency was expressed through a set of five or three behaviors. The frequency of adoption of each of the 79 behaviors listed in the questionnaire was evaluated on a scale from 0 (never demonstrated) to 10 (always demonstrated), including an option for “I don't know.” As demonstrated by past research, five‐point Likert scales adopted in most Anglo‐Saxon‐developed questionnaires are less appropriate than 0–10 scales applied in European countries, because the latter is the typical scale used in the school system (Batista‐Foguet et al ). The criteria adopted for the analysis of the external raters' assessments is illustrated in the Appendix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MBA participants and their raters were asked to indicate the frequency of the behavior on each item on an eleven point-scale ranging from (0) ‘the behavior is never shown’ to (10) ‘the behavior is consistently shown.’ This response set provides higher quality data on this predominantly European MBA population than the usual 5-point scale ( Batista-Foguet et al, 2009 ). The final ESCI-U scores have been mean-centered to ease the interpretation of the parameters in the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%