2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00167-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of rest from running on overuse injuries in Army basic training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In keeping with observations made across global military and athletic populations, the findings of this study indicate that overuse MSKI injuries were the most prevalent and potentially modifiable subclassifications [1,2,[8][9][10][14][15][16]34,[37][38][39][40]. Significant reductions in incidence were observed for overuse MSKI (non-fracture) for both OMEGA Line (12.52% 95% CI: 11.12-14.34%) compared to the average for the previous four years (21.74%: 95% CI: 20.76-22.75) and OMEGA Guards (11.36%; 95% CI: 7.81-16.23) and the four year average (25.09%: 95% CI: 23.04-27.29).…”
Section: Injury Typesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In keeping with observations made across global military and athletic populations, the findings of this study indicate that overuse MSKI injuries were the most prevalent and potentially modifiable subclassifications [1,2,[8][9][10][14][15][16]34,[37][38][39][40]. Significant reductions in incidence were observed for overuse MSKI (non-fracture) for both OMEGA Line (12.52% 95% CI: 11.12-14.34%) compared to the average for the previous four years (21.74%: 95% CI: 20.76-22.75) and OMEGA Guards (11.36%; 95% CI: 7.81-16.23) and the four year average (25.09%: 95% CI: 23.04-27.29).…”
Section: Injury Typesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Significant reductions in incidence were observed for overuse MSKI (non-fracture) for both OMEGA Line (12.52% 95% CI: 11.12-14.34%) compared to the average for the previous four years (21.74%: 95% CI: 20.76-22.75) and OMEGA Guards (11.36%; 95% CI: 7.81-16.23) and the four year average (25.09%: 95% CI: 23.04-27.29). These results compare favourably to the 17% incidence in overuse MSKI observed in US Basic Army Training [39]. Recognised amongst MSKI as the cause for the greatest amount of time lost out of training and therefore representing significant impact on organisational effectiveness, stress fractures, a sub-classification of overuse MSKI, have received considerable attention across the literature.…”
Section: Injury Typesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The occurrence of stress fractures is reported to be correlated to a higher weekly running mileage (12), as well as higher intensities and frequencies of training in both the military (13,14) and professional sports teams (15). As the training intensity is decreased, the loads on the bone are decreased, so bone damage is less likely to manifest.…”
Section: Extrinsic Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the primary microdamage hypothesis, the rate of microdamage accumulation exceeds the rate of bone repair. This could be caused by an abrupt change in duration, frequency, or intensity of training programs (14) or if the rate of bone formation is impaired (28).…”
Section: Stress Fracture Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevention of unintentional musculoskeletal injury is a continued focus of human performance managers and medical personnel in the military due to the high prevalence and significant impact that injury can have on performance and tactical readiness [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In comparison to general purpose forces, injury preven-tion in U.S. Special Forces may have amplified importance due to the high intensity and volume of physical and tactical training as well as the high-risk missions they execute [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%