2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-019-2824-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Reynolds number on a normal shock wave-transitional boundary-layer interaction over a curved surface

Abstract: The interaction between a normal shock wave and a boundary layer is investigated over a curved surface for a Reynolds number range, based on boundary-layer growing length x, of 0.44 × 10 6 ≤ Re x ≤ 1.09 × 10 6. The upstream boundary layer develops around the leading edge of the model before encountering a M ∼1.4 normal shock. This is followed by adverse pressure gradients. The shock position and strength are kept constant as Re is progressively varied. Infra-red thermography is used to determine the nature of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment runs at a Reynolds number relative to the nacelle lip thickness of 1.2 × 10 6 while the full-scale nacelle operates The FLIR SC7300LW set to an integration time of 320 µs is used for IR visualisation. Previous work with IR in the blow-down tunnel by Coschignano et al (2019) meant that a suitable IR window and camera mount is available, allowing for camera set up in less than an hour. The FLIR A615 was also tested and found to be sensitive enough for visualisation in the experiment.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment runs at a Reynolds number relative to the nacelle lip thickness of 1.2 × 10 6 while the full-scale nacelle operates The FLIR SC7300LW set to an integration time of 320 µs is used for IR visualisation. Previous work with IR in the blow-down tunnel by Coschignano et al (2019) meant that a suitable IR window and camera mount is available, allowing for camera set up in less than an hour. The FLIR A615 was also tested and found to be sensitive enough for visualisation in the experiment.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow separation may have a negative impact on the aerodynamic performance of the aircraft surfaces, especially when induced by a Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction (SWBLI) [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. This complex phenomenon [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] is likely to occur at transonic flow conditions on aircraft wings designed with laminar flow technology, where the laminar boundary layer over the suction side of the wing reaches supersonic speeds; the supersonic flow region is typically terminated by a (normal) shock, which interacts with the boundary layer and induces flow separation [ 1 , 14 , 15 ]. In this case, the flow generally undergoes transition to turbulence, and the strongly increased wall-normal transport of momentum (and energy) eventually leads to the reattachment of the turbulent flow to the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the flow generally undergoes transition to turbulence, and the strongly increased wall-normal transport of momentum (and energy) eventually leads to the reattachment of the turbulent flow to the surface. The resulting region of reverse flow enclosed within the boundary layer is commonly referred to as a Laminar Separation Bubble (LSB) [ 7 , 8 , 10 , 14 , 16 , 17 ]. Laminar SWBLI can also occur in other aerodynamic applications, including internal flows in the gas turbine engines of transonic commercial aircraft [ 7 , 18 , 19 ] and in the engines of supersonic and hypersonic vehicles [ 8 , 10 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further complicated phenomena are also observed by the presence of the transonic flow such as the interaction between -shock and the boundary layer flow [1][2][3]. These phenomena relate to flow separation, thus causing a negative effect on lift production of the wing [4][5]. The ONERA M6 wing, which was experimentally reported by Schmitt and Charpin [6], is a typical example of a transonic wing that can perform the mentioned phenomena, as presented by Dwight [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%