2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of roof-mounted solar panels on the wind energy exploitation on high-rise buildings

Abstract: The analysis of the wind flow around buildings is of great interest in the field of renewable energies. This work presents an investigation of the effects of roof-mounted solar panels on the wind flow on building roofs, from the point of view of the wind energy exploitation. CFD simulations of the wind flow around an isolated building are performed with OpenFOAM. The simulations are compared with two wind tunnel experiments for validation: an isolated building and an array of solar panels. The wind flow on an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spherical roof shows the lowest values in k, although the lower values at z/H < 1.05 are observed for shed and pitched roofs. As is shown in Figure 11c, the effect of the different roof shapes on the wind flow is clearly appreciated at the height of the turbulence intensity limit for horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT) of T I < 0.15 [18,40,41]. Compared with the flat roof, there is a moderate increase for pitched and shed roofs (15.2% and 26.6%, respectively), a moderate decrease for the vaulted roof (11.4%) and a significant decrease for the spherical roof (40.5%).…”
Section: State-of-the-art Roof Shapesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spherical roof shows the lowest values in k, although the lower values at z/H < 1.05 are observed for shed and pitched roofs. As is shown in Figure 11c, the effect of the different roof shapes on the wind flow is clearly appreciated at the height of the turbulence intensity limit for horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT) of T I < 0.15 [18,40,41]. Compared with the flat roof, there is a moderate increase for pitched and shed roofs (15.2% and 26.6%, respectively), a moderate decrease for the vaulted roof (11.4%) and a significant decrease for the spherical roof (40.5%).…”
Section: State-of-the-art Roof Shapesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The value of k at the curved edge significantly decreases at 1.03 < z/H < 1.35, especially at the center and downstream, reaching decrease rates close to 30%. Therefore, the curved edge has a very positive effect also on k. The effect of the different edge types tested is clearly appreciated at the height of the turbulence intensity threshold for a HAWT of T I < 0.15 [18,40,41], which remains rather constant at the cantilever and the simple edge, significantly increases for the railing edge and decreases for the curved edge (see Figure 20). For the railing edge, the height of the T I threshold of T I = 0.15 increases up to 20% upstream, 16% at the central region and 10% downstream.…”
Section: Influence Of the Roof Edge Shape On The Wind Flowmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although many studies [72][73][74][75] have shown that Large Eddy Simulation (LES) presents better agreement with experiments than RANS in particular when predicting the behaviour of the separated flows around buildings, its computational cost for modelling full scale geometries is very high. Hence RANS models are still widely used.…”
Section: Building Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toja-Silva et al [75] expanded their work by studying the impact of roof solar panels on wind turbines. The solar panels were simulated with tilt angles of 10-30 • .…”
Section: Building Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in some cases with both, such as the case of [241] analysis of wind flow around buildings and their effects on roof-mounted solar panels.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Loads On Scale Models For Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%