2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sample Transportation on the Proteome of Human Circulating Blood Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract: Circulating extracellular vesicles (cEV) are released by many kinds of cells and play an important role in cellular communication, signaling, inflammation modulation, coagulation, and tumor growth. cEV are of growing interest, not only as biomarkers, but also as potential treatment targets. However, very little is known about the effect of transporting biological samples from the clinical ward to the diagnostic laboratory, notably on the protein composition. Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) and human carriers (C) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…trypsin or BSA) as well as proteins identified only by site were removed for statistical validation. Differential protein abundance tests between the different sample groups were done with LFQ and Top3 protein intensities as described elsewhere ( Uldry et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trypsin or BSA) as well as proteins identified only by site were removed for statistical validation. Differential protein abundance tests between the different sample groups were done with LFQ and Top3 protein intensities as described elsewhere ( Uldry et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any remaining missing values were imputed by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation 75 method. Differential expression by moderated t statistics between the two groups and significance evaluation was performed as previously described 76 . The relative modification degree for ubiquitination residues was obtained by first summing the contributing intensities to each ubiquitination site in each sample, then dividing this quantity by the protein intensity, and averaging the result across the replicates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing peptides, respectively LFQ intensities, were imputed by drawing values from a Gaussian distribution of width 0.3 centered at the sample distribution mean minus 2.5x the sample standard deviation, provided there were at most 1 non zero value in the group; otherwise, the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (60) was used. Differential expression was performed by applying the empirical Bayes test (61) between groups; significance testing was performed as described (62).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%