2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sampler material on the uptake of PAHs into passive sampling devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The linearity HDPE has a high degree of crystallinity and higher density of 0.94-0.97 g cm À3 [83]. LDPE is often used for passive sampling devices to determine dissolved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), and other hydrophobic organic compounds in aquatic environments [84][85][86][87][88]. Batch sorption experiments were also used to determine PAH sorption to LDPE and HDPE pellets, and LDPE was identified to exhibit higher diffusion coefficients than HDPE meaning shorter equilibrium times for low-density polymers [89].…”
Section: Interactions With Other Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearity HDPE has a high degree of crystallinity and higher density of 0.94-0.97 g cm À3 [83]. LDPE is often used for passive sampling devices to determine dissolved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), and other hydrophobic organic compounds in aquatic environments [84][85][86][87][88]. Batch sorption experiments were also used to determine PAH sorption to LDPE and HDPE pellets, and LDPE was identified to exhibit higher diffusion coefficients than HDPE meaning shorter equilibrium times for low-density polymers [89].…”
Section: Interactions With Other Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Shoeib and Harner (2002) PUF showed that the sampling rate obtained in the first two weeks of the sampling period was higher than the sampling rate obtained between the third and twelfth weeks. Other factors are also reported to affect sampling rate: sampling conditions; area of the sampling material (Bartkow et al, 2004); holding capacity of the material (Harner et al, 2004, Hazrati andHarrad 2007); physicochemical properties of target compounds (Hazrati and Harrad 2007); passive sampler design (Hazrati andHarrad 2007, Allan et al, 2010); changes in ambient temperature and wind speed; gas/particle partitioning; and changes in ambient air concentration (Hazrati and Harrad 2007, Chaemfa et al, 2009, Persoon and Hornbuckle 2009, Allan et al, 2010, Melymuk et al, 2011.…”
Section: Discussion Of Sampling Ratesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Indeed, Eq. (2) reveals that (in the absence of biofouling) the uptake is rate limited by the membrane when d w /D w ( d s /D s K sw and by the water boundary layer when d w /D w ) d s /D s K sw (Huckins et al, 2006;Allan et al, 2010). Silicone has a d s /D s ratio slightly smaller than LDPE and tends to be more water boundary layer controlled.…”
Section: Exposure Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%