2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41779-019-00444-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sandblasting defects distribution on the mechanical strength of a soda-lime glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The properties were determined using assintered samples. The flexural strength values of mullite, soda-lime glass and AlN are 182 MPa 26 and 87 MPa, 32 and 300-350 MPa, 17 respectively. The flexural strength was 92 F I G U R E 5 Young's modulus and flexural strength of the composites sintered at optimum sintering temperature for each composition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The properties were determined using assintered samples. The flexural strength values of mullite, soda-lime glass and AlN are 182 MPa 26 and 87 MPa, 32 and 300-350 MPa, 17 respectively. The flexural strength was 92 F I G U R E 5 Young's modulus and flexural strength of the composites sintered at optimum sintering temperature for each composition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties were determined using as‐sintered samples. The flexural strength values of mullite, soda‐lime glass and AlN are 182 MPa 26 and 87 MPa, 32 and 300–350 MPa, 17 respectively. The flexural strength was 92 (±19) MPa for the M55, 111 (± 24) MPa for the M55‐1, 101 (± 17) MPa for the M55‐2.5, 97 (± 17) MPa for the M‐55‐5 and 88 (±11) MPa for the M55‐10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It was also reported for the SiO 2 -B 2 O 3 -CaO-MgO glass/Al 2 O 3 composites that k decreased with increasing glass content from 3.56 W/m⋅K (50 wt% glass) to 3.20 W/m⋅K (60 wt% glass). 41 Although crystalline phases such as mullite and in situ crystallized anorthite were present in the structure, these phases were embraced by an amorphous phase that reduced the overall thermal conductivity of the composites. 44 An increasing glass content decreased the CTE to 4.61 ppm/ • C for the M10, 4.27 ppm/ • C for the M20, and 4.25 ppm/ • C for the M30.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Note that mullite and glass are end members given to compare the properties of the composites. Glass-ceramic composites are used for the LTCC applications that require densification at temperatures lower than 950 • C to allow cofiring with metal electrodes (e.g., silver melts at 961 • C 52 ), a CTE matching to Si chips for reliability, higher thermal conductivity to remove heat from the circuit, and lower 3.06 [23] 7.4 [23] 0.0031 [23] 6.07 [47] 5.26 [23] -142 [23] 1070-1120 [23] 185 [23] 182 2.43 [22] 6.37 [22] 0.0016 [22] 0.85 [48] 0.55 [25] --591 ± 33 [22] 70 [42] 87 [41] dielectric constant (loss) to increase signal transmission speed (to reduce heat loss). 9 Low thermal conductivity is one of the main disadvantages of the LTCC systems due to the poor thermal conductivity of the glass phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation