Effect of Sandplay Therapy on the Mental Health Level of College Students

Abstract

To analyze the effect of sandplay (SP) therapy on the mental health level of college students. 500 college students were openly recruited, using the University Student Mental Health Questionnaire (UPI) to screen out 76 students in the UPI category. 34 college students were randomly selected and divided into two groups, 17 in the control group and 17 in the SP therapy group (experimental group); the control group received no treatment, and the experimental group was treated with SP therapy, to analyze the differences between groups before and after the intervention of SCL-90 and self-made group self-reflection questionnaire. (1) With a detection rate of 15.2 percent, 76 of the 500 college students solicited openly were identified as UPI students; (2) except for the terror factor, there were significant differences in other aspects and overall scores for the experimental group following SP therapy intervention, and the scores reduced. There were no significant differences in the total scores and scores of all factors in the control group ( P > 0.05 ). The overall score, somatization, interpersonal connection, depression, paranoia, and psychosis were all significantly different between the experimental and control groups in the independent sample t -test ( P < 0.05 ).

Retracted: Effect of Sandplay Therapy on the Mental Health Level of College Students

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”