1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-4343(97)00050-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of scallop shells and sediment grain size on phytoplankton flux to the bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degradable organic particles, e.g. phytoplankton cells, are retained in the uppermost sediment layer in permeable sediment when water is filtered through the bed due to drainage or bottom current driven sediment percolation (Pilditch et al 1997, Huettel & Rusch 2000. The degradation of this material may only cause a nonsignificant change in the nutrient concentration at the lower flat site due to the relatively high background concentrations; however, it may have caused the noticeable seasonal changes in the DOC concentration at that site and also at the upper flat site.…”
Section: Differences Between the Upper And Lower Sand Flat Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degradable organic particles, e.g. phytoplankton cells, are retained in the uppermost sediment layer in permeable sediment when water is filtered through the bed due to drainage or bottom current driven sediment percolation (Pilditch et al 1997, Huettel & Rusch 2000. The degradation of this material may only cause a nonsignificant change in the nutrient concentration at the lower flat site due to the relatively high background concentrations; however, it may have caused the noticeable seasonal changes in the DOC concentration at that site and also at the upper flat site.…”
Section: Differences Between the Upper And Lower Sand Flat Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, this exchange process has been confirmed by several research groups (Harrison et al 1983, Falter & Sansone 2000, Precht & Huettel 2004, Reimers et al 2004, with measured and calculated filtration rates of up to several hundreds of liters m -2 d -1 . This relatively strong interfacial water flow has the potential to carry suspended small particles into the porous sand bed, and several flume and in situ experiments demonstrated that clay particles, fluorescent tracer particles and planktonic algae can be transported into the bed by the interfacial water flows (Packman & Brooks 1995, Pilditch et al 1998, Huettel & Rusch 2000, Packman et al 2000, Packman & Brooks 2001. As oxygen enters the sediment with the same water flows as the particles, and degradation products are removed from the sediment by the porewater flows , this filtration process also promotes a sedimentary environment that is supportive of efficient and rapid degradation of organic particles carried into the bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peridiniella catenata cells were found down to 37 mm (1 and 1.5 m stations), and 52 mm sediment depth (0.5 m station) revealing a rapid vertical transport process. Flume studies conducted by Pilditch et al (1998) and Huettel & Rusch (2000), showed that microalgae are carried several centimeters deep into permeable sands of similar permeabilities by interfacial fluid flows associated with bottom topography. The relatively rapid interfacial transport processes in the rippled sand bed produced a tight spatial and temporal coupling between algal cell concentrations in the water column and the sediment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this also implies that under normal conditions, advection could sustain oxygen consumption in excess of the rates measured in this study given a sufficient supply of labile organic matter. Such conditions can be expected during phytoplankton blooms, when fresh organic particles are abundant in the water column and transported into the sediment by means of advection (Pilditch et al 1998;Huettel and Rusch 2000;Rusch et al 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%