DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Scan Angle and Reconstruction Algorithm on Model Observer Performance in Tomosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of angular projections has varied between 11 and 25 within a total angular span in the 30°-60°r ange. [6][7][8] While tomosynthesis optimization has also been approached in some recent studies, 5,[9][10][11][12] thus far, no framework has been developed for complete optimization of the acquisition scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of angular projections has varied between 11 and 25 within a total angular span in the 30°-60°r ange. [6][7][8] While tomosynthesis optimization has also been approached in some recent studies, 5,[9][10][11][12] thus far, no framework has been developed for complete optimization of the acquisition scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in electronics and computer technology have led to the development of digital image receptors and displays (2). New image processing techniques, advanced applications such as energy and temporal subtraction radiography (3, 4), digital tomosynthesis (5-7), and computer-assisted detection and diagnosis (8, 9) promise to substantially improve on the performance of conventional chest radiography (1). …”
Section: Challenges In Chest Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on two tasks in this work: the detection of microcalcifications, small deposits of calcium which can indicate malignancy, and the detection of small low-contrast disks, intended to mimic subtle lesions. Previous work by others has investigated the use of the HO for optimization of DBT acquisition parameters, [6][7][8][9] benchmarking DBT acquisition relative to mammography, 8,10 and, similar to this work, exploring the impact of image reconstruction. 6,11 Often, the HO's performance for a given task is estimated using a collection of sample images, resulting in statistically variable estimates of the HO's figure of merit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous work by others has investigated the use of the HO for optimization of DBT acquisition parameters, [6][7][8][9] benchmarking DBT acquisition relative to mammography, 8,10 and, similar to this work, exploring the impact of image reconstruction. 6,11 Often, the HO's performance for a given task is estimated using a collection of sample images, resulting in statistically variable estimates of the HO's figure of merit. Since we wish to perform optimization of several reconstruction parameters, for efficiency, we construct an approximation of HO performance which does not rely on samples of noisy images, and is therefore nonstochastic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%