1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.363954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of scan size and surface roughness on microscale friction measurements

Abstract: The effect of scan size (scan length) and surface roughness on microscale friction was studied using atomic force/friction force microscopy. Three silicon specimens with different surface roughnesses were studied. Surface height and friction force plots were obtained simultaneously and friction mechanisms for the correlation between them were sought. The standard deviation of surface heights increases with the scan size initially and approaches a constant value at a scan length greater than the long wavelength… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This dependence was first reported by , and Bhushan (1995) and later discussed in more detail by Koinkar & Bhushan (1997a) and Sundararajan & Bhushan (2000). The ratchet mechanism and the collision effects semi-quantitatively explain the correlation between the slopes of the roughness maps and friction force maps observed.…”
Section: (B ) Microscale Frictionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This dependence was first reported by , and Bhushan (1995) and later discussed in more detail by Koinkar & Bhushan (1997a) and Sundararajan & Bhushan (2000). The ratchet mechanism and the collision effects semi-quantitatively explain the correlation between the slopes of the roughness maps and friction force maps observed.…”
Section: (B ) Microscale Frictionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…14 Autocorrelation function and autocorrelation length ͑ACL͒ have been widely used in surface-related studies [15][16][17][18][19] to provide spatial information in addition to amplitude parameters, such as root-mean-square roughness. Generally, ACL is used to measure how quickly a random event decays or the distance over which two points can be treated as independent in a random process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,50 In our study, a lack of correlation is evident from the plot of the friction coe cient μ against the average dome size φ (average dome diameter), as shown in Figure 6 (a) at a shear velocity v = 10 µm s −1 . Such lack of correlation is true for the data at all other shear velocities studied.…”
Section: Friction-load Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 59%