2021
DOI: 10.3389/frsen.2021.719610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Scattering Angle on Earth Reflectance

Abstract: After March 2020 the range of scattering angle for DSCOVR EPIC and NISTAR has been substantially increased with its upper bound reaching 178°. This provides a unique opportunity to observe bi-directional effects of reflectance near backscattering directions. The dependence of the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance on scattering angle is shown separately for ocean and land areas, for cloudy and clear pixels, while cloudy pixels are also separated into liquid and ice clouds. A strong increase of TOA reflectance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 therefore becomes of particular importance for analyses of EPIC observations over vegetated land. A strong effect of phase angle on EPIC reflectance was recently documented in (Marshak et al, 2021). Our analyses reinforce this effect.…”
Section: Monitoring Equatorial Forestssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 therefore becomes of particular importance for analyses of EPIC observations over vegetated land. A strong effect of phase angle on EPIC reflectance was recently documented in (Marshak et al, 2021). Our analyses reinforce this effect.…”
Section: Monitoring Equatorial Forestssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…DSCOVR returned to full operations on March 2, 2020 after the navigation problem had been resolved. After March 2020 the range of phase has substantially increased towards backscattering reaching 2 ° (Lyapustin et al, 2021;Marshak et al, 2021).…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During many seasons, measurements are taken relatively infrequently at those scattering angles from LEO and GEO satellites [e.g., Minnis et al (1998), Figure A1], so DSCOVR's nearly constant scattering angle everywhere on Earth is markedly different from those associated with other satellites. Yet, each scattering angle configuration has its advantages and problems, Marshak et al, 2021).…”
Section: Earth-observing Characteristics Of Dscovrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in DSCOVR viewing geometry directly affect the amount of reflected SW radiation that NISTAR and EPIC receive (Marshak et al, 2021), and require explicit use of the DSCOVR Satellite Ephemeris in the GCM SHS modeling to account for the changing GCM grid-box projected area, as seen from the DSCOVR Satellite perspective. With this explicit SHS modeling in place, the GCM SHS sampled output data are collected with the same Sun-Satellite viewing geometry of Earth as is the case for NISTAR and EPIC observational data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that NISTAR observations of the Earth are from the vicinity of the Lagrangian L1 point, and are near zero phase angle, the expected reflected solar SW flux from the sunlit hemisphere would be near 200 Wm -2 , and the outgoing longwave (OLR) near 240 Wm -2 . However, the NISTAR data are near-backscattered radiances that are sensitive to phase angle variability (Marshak et al, 2021). The NISTAR near-backscattered radiance-to-flux conversion is still an ongoing endeavor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%