2022
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00514-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Seasonality on Microbiological Variability of Raw Cow Milk from Apulian Dairy Farms in Italy

Abstract: The strength of this study lies in the microbiological characterization of a wide range of farm management data to achieve a more comprehensive framework of Apulian milk. Specific regional pedoclimatic and management conditions impact the taxa present and their abundances within this ecological food niche. The obtained results lay the groundwork for comparison with other worldwide extensive farming areas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several minority bacterial and fungal taxa were also identified in the two raw milk batches by Illumina DNA sequencing; though Latilactobacillus sakei , Enterococcus spp., Macrococcus caseolyticus , Lactobacillus spp., and Kluyveromyces marxianus were detected in both R1_M and R2_M, these batches differed significantly in number and relative abundance of the detected taxa, with R1_M harboring Kurtzmaniella zeylanoides , and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and R2_M being characterized by the occurrence of Lactobacillus delbrueckii , Weissella spp., and Pichia spp. As previously suggested by other authors, the differences emerged between the two raw milk samples, collected in spring (R1_M) and late summer (R2_M) 2021, respectively, might be likely ascribed to the seasonality [ 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several minority bacterial and fungal taxa were also identified in the two raw milk batches by Illumina DNA sequencing; though Latilactobacillus sakei , Enterococcus spp., Macrococcus caseolyticus , Lactobacillus spp., and Kluyveromyces marxianus were detected in both R1_M and R2_M, these batches differed significantly in number and relative abundance of the detected taxa, with R1_M harboring Kurtzmaniella zeylanoides , and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and R2_M being characterized by the occurrence of Lactobacillus delbrueckii , Weissella spp., and Pichia spp. As previously suggested by other authors, the differences emerged between the two raw milk samples, collected in spring (R1_M) and late summer (R2_M) 2021, respectively, might be likely ascribed to the seasonality [ 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[4] The effects of climate and environmental factors on milk microbiota and dairy products have been previously examined. [28][29][30] In fact, the highest diversity of raw cow milk was investigated in June, while the lowest was in December. [28] The need of thoroughly characterizing the microbial composition of kurut samples in order to develop commercial starting cultures at the industrial scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a recent study put forward the fact that sampling locations accounted for considerable differences in LAB composition rather than milk sources of the dairy products of which effects were quite less [4] . The effects of climate and environmental factors on milk microbiota and dairy products have been previously examined [28–30] . In fact, the highest diversity of raw cow milk was investigated in June, while the lowest was in December [28] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spoilage of milk resulting from the contamination of dairy products with psychrotrophic microorganisms can result in significant quality loss of milk according to a study conducted by Dogan andBoor in 2003 (Dogan &Boor, 2003). During storage, the micro-biota shifts toward psychrotrophic microorganisms, which can easily reduce the quality of raw milk in low temperatures (Celano et al, 2022). Pseudomonas has been identified as predominant milk-associated psychrotrophic bacteria (Lampugnani et al, 2019).…”
Section: Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%