2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-018-4831-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of self-assembly aggregation on physical properties of non-aqueous ionogels based on LMWG

Abstract: In recent years the low-molecular-weight gelators (LMWG) started to be used as a hardener for liquid electrolytes to create ionogels (OIG). The characteristic properties of gels created by LMWG, like thermal reversibility, very low critical concentration of the gelator, and huge versatility of possible compounds that can be used, were thought to give them advantage over commercial polymer gel electrolytes (PGE). However, the PGE are still dominating, mainly thanks to its superior mechanical resistance and wide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 On the other hand, supramolecular ionogels possess certain disadvantages which are mainly related to their inferior mechanical strength and low(er) temperature range of their quasi-solid state with the sol-gel transition temperature being oen below 100 C. However, recent investigations reported on supramolecular ionogels with an enhanced mechanical strength and thermal stability. [13][14][15][16] Such results are promising and encourage further research in the direction for nding new LMWGs, which would efficiently gel ILs producing highly conductive, however mechanically and thermally stable supramolecular ionogels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12 On the other hand, supramolecular ionogels possess certain disadvantages which are mainly related to their inferior mechanical strength and low(er) temperature range of their quasi-solid state with the sol-gel transition temperature being oen below 100 C. However, recent investigations reported on supramolecular ionogels with an enhanced mechanical strength and thermal stability. [13][14][15][16] Such results are promising and encourage further research in the direction for nding new LMWGs, which would efficiently gel ILs producing highly conductive, however mechanically and thermally stable supramolecular ionogels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Indeed, storage modulus for the ionogel from the combination 6 containing 1 wt% of gelator 2 (optimal gelator concentration) reaches 278 kPa, which is higher than that of the strongest ionogel prepared by gelators based on urea (z160 kPa), 13 and that of highly temperature-stable ionogels prepared via metal-coordination interaction (z46 kPa). 15 Interestingly, such high mechanical strength is achieved in spite of the high gelator mobility (D Gelator on the order of 10 À12 m 2 s À1 ). Clearly, aggregation of gelator molecules with anions plays a major role, as discussed above, and this aggregation is responsible for the mechanical stability.…”
Section: Rheological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The glycerol spectra are not fully resolved, but the peaks have the correct spacing. [ 19 ] In the unencapsulated case, a drop of glycerol was placed at the end of the polymeric tube and got sucked into the tube by capillary forces. The same forces caused some of the glycerol to crawl in the corners between tube and glass substrate, therefore placing some sample material outside of the microcoil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion of T 1 and T 2 Variations in Electrically Stressed Glycerol. A recalculation of measured T 1 and T 2 times to the present temperatures using the calibration curves from Figure 8 should lead to a linear progression as any temperature-dependent changes, e.g., of chemical shifts, 50 are considered by experimental calibration curves. Hence, it is expected that the two derived temperatures will agree and should line up with the diagonal line in Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%