1986
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.2.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations.

Abstract: The effect of altering the labels attached to points was examined in three experiments. The first experiment measured the extent of clustering that occurs based on the labels alone. This experiment also established norms for the remainder of the study. In the second and third experiments, subjects were required to learn the locations of points. The points were labeled in such a way as to suggest certain spatial clusterings. It was shown that subjects cluster points with regard to the labels attached to the poi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Encoding spatial information verbally in this way can account for many biases found in spatial memory. For example, it may account for biases in the memory of locations (Fitting, Allen, & Wedell, 2007;Huttenlocher et al, 1991); biases in the angles of intersections (e.g., Tversky, 1981); and it may mediate grouping effects due to political, semantic, or conceptual similarities (e.g., Carbon & Leder, 2005;Hirtle & Mascolo, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encoding spatial information verbally in this way can account for many biases found in spatial memory. For example, it may account for biases in the memory of locations (Fitting, Allen, & Wedell, 2007;Huttenlocher et al, 1991); biases in the angles of intersections (e.g., Tversky, 1981); and it may mediate grouping effects due to political, semantic, or conceptual similarities (e.g., Carbon & Leder, 2005;Hirtle & Mascolo, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonspatial characteristics of an environment are perceived and incorporated into one's cognitive map along with spatial features (McNamara et al, 1992;McNamara & LeSueur, 1989). When this information has categorical structure, people cluster locations on the basis of their function (Hirtle & Jonides, 1985;Merrill & Baird, 1987), their physical similarity (Hirtle & Kallman, 1988), and the semantic category into which they fall (Hirtle & Mascolo, 1986). Social information, unlike function, physical similarity, or semantic identity, is indirectly linked to locations; it has stronger associations to people associated with the locations than to the locations Hypotheses.…”
Section: Structuring Spatial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tversky, 1981), or made symmetric (Palmer, 1975). Furthermore, items that are a constant distance apart are judged to be closer together when they are perceived to belong to the same region than when they are perceived to belong to different regions (Coren & Girgus, 1980;Hirtle & Mascolo, 1986).…”
Section: Biases In Geographical Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%