Effect of sensory-based intervention on the increased use of food-related descriptive terms among restrained eaters

Can eating pleasure be a lever for healthy eating? A systematic scoping review of eating pleasure and its links with dietary behaviors and health

“…Dietary behavior and health outcomes for each study are presented in Table 5 . Of the 45 studies identified, 31 (68.9%) included only dietary outcomes [ 7 , 13 , 25 – 29 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 75 , 76 , 84 , 86 , 88 , 109 , 111 , 125 , 126 , 136 , 140 , 145 – 148 , 150 – 152 , 159 , 160 , 161 ], 10 (22.2%) only health outcomes [ 30 , 35 , 36 , 74 , 89 , 112 , 137 , 156 – 158 ] and 4 (8.9%) included both dietary and health outcomes [ 21 , 31 , 32 , 141 ].…”

“…The dietary outcomes studied were very diverse, the most studied being diet quality (i.e., food/dietary intakes, balanced diet, adherence to nutritional guidelines) (n = 13) [ 13 , 27 – 29 , 32 , 33 , 84 , 86 , 109 , 140 , 148 , 150 , 160 ], food choices (n = 8) [ 7 , 26 , 84 , 86 , 125 , 147 , 148 , 160 ], portion size (n = 4) [ 21 , 32 , 37 , 159 ], and restrained eating (n = 4) [ 21 , 31 , 76 , 145 ]. Other dietary outcomes were assessed in two studies or less and comprized emotional eating (n = 2) [ 76 , 145 ], external eating (n = 2) [ 76 , 145 ], intuitive eating (n = 2) [ 31 , 126 ], perceived importance of family meals (n = 2) [ 75 , 111 ], food neophobia/fussiness (n = 2) [ 136 , 141 ], taste description ability (n = 2) [ 136 , 161 ], likelihood to try new food / recipes (n = 2) [ 32 , 136 ], cooking skills (n = 2) [ 136 , 160 ], the amount time spent for cooking/involvement in cooking activities (n = 2) [ 32 , 136 ], the amount of time ...…”

“…Among the 35 studies that included dietary outcomes, 20 (57.1%) were cross-sectional studies, eight (22.9%) were short-term, single exposure intervention studies, five (14.3%) were longer-term, prolonged exposure intervention studies, one (2.9%) was a mixed-design study and one (2.9%) was a prospective study. Of these, 20 (57.1%) observed favorable associations between eating pleasure and dietary variables [ 7 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 32 , 75 , 88 , 111 , 125 , 126 , 136 , 140 , 147 , 148 , 151 , 159 – 161 ] while six (17.1%) reported unfavorable associations [ 33 , 34 , 76 , 86 , 145 , 152 ], five (14.3%) mixed associations (both favorable and unfavorable associations) [ 13 , 21 , 27 , 37 , 146 ] and four (11.4%) neutral association [ 84 , 109 , 141 , 150 ]. When only intervention studies were considered, we observed that most of the papers (11/13; 84.6%) reported positive dietary outcomes [ 7 , 32 , 125 , 136 , 140 , 147 , 148 , 159 – 161 ], while only one observed mixed effects [ 37 ] and one neutral effect [ 141 ].…”

“…the role of food in life (Rozin et al, 1999) [125,126], (18) the food enjoyment subscale of a questionnaire assessing children's relationship with food (Ensaff et al, 2016) [136] and (19) a questionnaire assessing remembered enjoyment (Robinson et al 2011) [148]. Nine studies [21,26,28,74,76,136,140,148,152] included multiple measures of eating pleasure while six intervention studies [7,31,32,37,159,161] that used eating pleasure in their strategies did not measure the impact of their interventions on eating pleasure. Dietary behavior and health outcomes.…”

“…In addition, two studies reported results from the same long-term intervention [31,161]. Therefore, 12 intervention papers were included in this analysis [7,32,37,136,140,141,147,148,[159][160][161], reporting results from 11 independent interventions. Seven (63.6%) were short-term, single exposure interventions while four (36.4%) were longer-term, prolonged exposure interventions.…”