1996
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00415-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of service and vaginal-cervical anesthesia on estrus duration in dairy goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean overall duration of the induced estrous period (29.7 ± 1.3 h) recorded in this study is similar to that reported by Greyling and Van der Nest (2000) and Motlomelo et al (2002) and lower than that reported by Romano (1996), Romano and Benech (1996), Romano and Fernandez Abella (1997) and Romano et al (2000). The mean estrous duration was shorter (P < 0.05) in the MAP/ PMSG treatment (26.3 ± 2.4 h), compared to the FGA/PMSG/PGF 2α treatment (34.5 ± 3.0 h).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mean overall duration of the induced estrous period (29.7 ± 1.3 h) recorded in this study is similar to that reported by Greyling and Van der Nest (2000) and Motlomelo et al (2002) and lower than that reported by Romano (1996), Romano and Benech (1996), Romano and Fernandez Abella (1997) and Romano et al (2000). The mean estrous duration was shorter (P < 0.05) in the MAP/ PMSG treatment (26.3 ± 2.4 h), compared to the FGA/PMSG/PGF 2α treatment (34.5 ± 3.0 h).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A relatively similar interval was mentioned by Leboeuf et al (2003), were intravaginal FGA (20 or 45 mg) sponges during the breeding and non-breeding season. With respect to the onset estrous, on the other hand, bigger periods have been reported by Baril et al (1993), Romano (1996Romano ( , 1998Romano ( , 2002, Romano and Benech (1996), Romano and Fernandez Abella (1997), Freitas et al (1996aFreitas et al ( ,b, 1997, Greyling and Van der Nest (2000) and Motlomelo et al (2002) in does. The reason for differences is not clear, however it may be attributed to differences in breed, nutrition, season, use of gonadotrophins, presence of females in proestrous/estrous and presence of the male after sponge removal all factors that are known to influence this parameter (Doney et al, 1973;Greyling and Van Niekerk, 1990;Mani et al, 1992;Romano, 1998Romano, , 2002Ahmed et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Goldfoot & Goy, 1970; Carter & Schein, 1971; Hardy & DeBold, 1972; Oglesby et al. , 1981; Romano & Benech, 1996; review in Huck & Lisk, 1986). Importantly, male rodents may thus experience opposing selection pressures with respect to offensive and defensive aspects of sperm competition – that is, the need to increase sperm transfer with rapid and/or frequent ejaculations, as demonstrated here, while also providing sufficient copulatory stimulation to reduce the probability that their ejaculates will be diluted in subsequent copulations.…”
Section: Evolution Of Multiple Intromissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%