2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of shear-span/depth ratio on debonding failures of FRP-strengthened RC beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Garden and Hollaway [28] and Garden et al [29] indicated that the formation and widening of the shear and tributary cracks at the plate end region were responsible for the initiation of PE debonding failure. A similar observation was also reported by Smith and Teng [30], Pham and Al-Mahaidi [31], and Al-Saawani et al [6], where PE debonding took place after the formation of shear cracks at the end of FRP plates. Some studies also revealed the relationship between PE debonding failure load and nominal shear capacity of FRP-strengthened RC beams.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Garden and Hollaway [28] and Garden et al [29] indicated that the formation and widening of the shear and tributary cracks at the plate end region were responsible for the initiation of PE debonding failure. A similar observation was also reported by Smith and Teng [30], Pham and Al-Mahaidi [31], and Al-Saawani et al [6], where PE debonding took place after the formation of shear cracks at the end of FRP plates. Some studies also revealed the relationship between PE debonding failure load and nominal shear capacity of FRP-strengthened RC beams.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The utilization of strain capacity of FRP is generally low in strengthened beams failing by PE debonding compared with those failing by IC debonding. A recent study [ 6 ] on carbon FRP (CFRP) strengthened RC beams tested under different shear span to depth ratios has indicated a CFRP strain range of 12.9% to 27.2% of the CFRP rupture strain at PE debonding. Meanwhile, the corresponding range at IC debonding was 33.3% to 40.1% of the CFRP rupture strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many analytical models and numerical techniques have been also presented to evaluate the failure strength of concrete cover separation [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. The concrete tooth model [ 29 , 30 ] is one of the well-known analytical models, and furthermore, has been extended by numerous researchers [ 27 , 31 , 32 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%