2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of shoe type on plantar pressure: A gender comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater AVLR of the MSR group may be problematic because these runners also were wearing minimalist shoes, which reduce plantar contact area and increase calcaneal contact pressure. 43,44 The vertical ground reaction force curves of all MSR and TSR runners in this study contained impact peaks. No MSA vertical ground reaction force curves contained impact peaks.…”
Section: Foot-strike Patterns and Loading Ratesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The greater AVLR of the MSR group may be problematic because these runners also were wearing minimalist shoes, which reduce plantar contact area and increase calcaneal contact pressure. 43,44 The vertical ground reaction force curves of all MSR and TSR runners in this study contained impact peaks. No MSA vertical ground reaction force curves contained impact peaks.…”
Section: Foot-strike Patterns and Loading Ratesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5,[7][8][9][10]22,26 When examining a side-cut task, the medial portion of the foot experiences more loading than the lateral portions of the foot. 5,10 The results of this study are similar to those that have been reported previously with the largest loads being seen beneath the medial border of the foot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it was noteworthy to find a substantial increase (i.e., ?5.60 mm on average) in COP path length for the non-MOCP users at &ovulation compared to menstruation (in agreement with H 2 ). Intuitively, an increase in COP path length may be attributed to an increase in mid-foot contact area due to a more flat-footed posture (Queen et al 2010). Given the protocol-induced consistency in ground contact time, a longer COP path at &ovulation is thought to have contributed to the concomitant increase in COP velocity (i.e., ?18.60 mm s -1 on average) given that foot movements associated with absorption and propulsion during the hopping task would need to occur at a faster rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%