2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of shot peening time on δ/γ residual stress profiles of AISI 304 weld

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the significant differences in CRS were SCRS related to the plastic deformation of peened surface, the MCRS, the MCRSD and the CRSLD (Figure 5(c,d)). In general, the increase in shots velocity or the extension of peening time are conducive to improving the plastic deformation [36,37], thereby promoting the rise of the SCRS. Therefore, the CSP treatment resulted in more pronounced SCRS due to higher shot velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the significant differences in CRS were SCRS related to the plastic deformation of peened surface, the MCRS, the MCRSD and the CRSLD (Figure 5(c,d)). In general, the increase in shots velocity or the extension of peening time are conducive to improving the plastic deformation [36,37], thereby promoting the rise of the SCRS. Therefore, the CSP treatment resulted in more pronounced SCRS due to higher shot velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FWHM is defined as the amplitude of the peak at the average height of its intensity, and its measurement is given in degrees 55 . A change of the FWHM could be used to predict the surface coverage of the SP process 36 . In the same way, a decrease in peak intensity is associated with an increase in residual compressive stresses on the surface 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change of the FWHM could be used to predict the surface coverage of the SP process 36 . In the same way, a decrease in peak intensity is associated with an increase in residual compressive stresses on the surface 36 . The aforementioned coincides with that observed in the XRD graph of the present study, where an increase in FWHM is observed in the sample submitted to SP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the MCRS of USPed samples were less than that of the SPed sample. Among the USPed samples, the larger MCRS of the USP2 specimen was ascribed to more plastic deformation induced by the longer processing duration [20,43]. Generally speaking, the increase of the balls will cause a more significant plastic deformation zone, which corresponds to deeper CRSL.…”
Section: Residual Stressmentioning
confidence: 95%