2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Single and Multisite Calibration Techniques on the Parameter Estimation, Performance, and Output of a SWAT Model of a Spatially Heterogeneous Catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results follow the findings of Leta et al (2017) who observed that SC out-performed the SSC technique in their study. Comparing the streamflow hydrographs obtained using the three techniques, it can be observed that; (1) with the SSC technique peak flows were overestimated at the outlet and at Katoa during validation upstream (Figs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Calibration Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results follow the findings of Leta et al (2017) who observed that SC out-performed the SSC technique in their study. Comparing the streamflow hydrographs obtained using the three techniques, it can be observed that; (1) with the SSC technique peak flows were overestimated at the outlet and at Katoa during validation upstream (Figs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Calibration Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Migliaccio and Chaubey (2007) recommend the use of SC technique for calibrating nested sub-basins with hydrologic connections. Contrary to the SC technique used by Wi et al (2015), Shrestha et al (2016) and Leta et al (2017), whereby the calibrated and optimized parameter set obtained in the upstream gauge is fixed while calibrating the downstream counterpart, that approach was not adopted in this study because of the hydrological connection between upstream and downstream hydrometric stations. Note that the same number of parameters and their ranges were used to initiate each calibration.…”
Section: Model Sensitivity Analysis Calibration Validation and Uncementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is particularly problematic for large systems where parameters estimated for some parts of the watershed may be unrealistic for other parts. For example, Leta et al () assessed the impact of calibrating at a single site, at multiple sites with constant parameter values, and at multiple sites with varying parameter values for a 1,162 km 2 watershed in Belgium. Their results indicated using different parameter values among different regions improved calibration results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%