2001 Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1,2001 2001
DOI: 10.13031/2013.3534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Single Animal Feeding Stations and Group Size on Growing Performance of Group Housed Fattening Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systems are currently available to measure feed intake in association with feeding behavior for cattle (Basarab et al, 2003;Chapinal et al, 2007;Kelly et al, 2010), swine (Andree and Huegle, 2001;Chapinal et al, 2008;Hyun and Ellis, 2002;Nienaber et al, 1991), small livestock (Basarab et al, 2003;Gipson et al, 2006Gipson et al, , 2007Goetsch et al, 2010), and poultry (Puma et al, 2001). While some of these systems provide the user with feed intake data in addition to feeding behavior, they require feeders to be accessed by a single animal at a time and due to the cost only a limited number of feeding stations are placed in a pen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems are currently available to measure feed intake in association with feeding behavior for cattle (Basarab et al, 2003;Chapinal et al, 2007;Kelly et al, 2010), swine (Andree and Huegle, 2001;Chapinal et al, 2008;Hyun and Ellis, 2002;Nienaber et al, 1991), small livestock (Basarab et al, 2003;Gipson et al, 2006Gipson et al, , 2007Goetsch et al, 2010), and poultry (Puma et al, 2001). While some of these systems provide the user with feed intake data in addition to feeding behavior, they require feeders to be accessed by a single animal at a time and due to the cost only a limited number of feeding stations are placed in a pen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%