2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sintering temperature on the aging resistance and mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the present study coincide with Limsamai et al [45] and Amat et al [46] who concluded that autoclave aging promoted grain pull-out in the microstructure due to t→m transformation that initiated at the surface layer of zirconia and potentially grew into the bulk of the material.…”
Section: Translucency Evaluation Was Evaluated By Calculating Contrassupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Results of the present study coincide with Limsamai et al [45] and Amat et al [46] who concluded that autoclave aging promoted grain pull-out in the microstructure due to t→m transformation that initiated at the surface layer of zirconia and potentially grew into the bulk of the material.…”
Section: Translucency Evaluation Was Evaluated By Calculating Contrassupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One peak representing the monoclinic phase of zirconia was detected by XRD on all samples. The appearance of this phase can be, on one side, attributed to the sintering of the ceramic at 1500°C, since the slightly higher temperatures could have led to an augmented grain size and minor transformation from the tetragonal to the monoclinic phase during cooling [30]. Other authors have also reported certain percentages of monoclinic zirconia, detected by XRD, on the green bodies of Alumina toughened Zirconia [31], and after sintering [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 55 After 3 months of soaking in pH 5.0 SBF, the addition of the 30% CaSi to Y-TZP caused a significant reduction in biaxial strength, while the 20% CaSi dopant maintained the strength. The material degradation may begin at the surface layer of the material and grow into the bulk of the material, 60 which in turn remarkably affects the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%