2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of soaking and germination on grain matrix and glycaemic potential: A comparative study on white quinoa, proso and foxtail millet flours

Priyanka Prasad,
Jatindra K. Sahu
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content of tannins may also decrease during germination due to their absorption in water and polyphenol interaction with proteins and carbohydrates. 130 Prasad et al 131 examined how germination treatment affected white quinoa, proso, and foxtail millet flour. The total starch, amylose, amylopectin, polyphenols, flavonoids, in vitro protein digestibility, and glycemic potential of the flours changed dramatically.…”
Section: Digestibility Of Milletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of tannins may also decrease during germination due to their absorption in water and polyphenol interaction with proteins and carbohydrates. 130 Prasad et al 131 examined how germination treatment affected white quinoa, proso, and foxtail millet flour. The total starch, amylose, amylopectin, polyphenols, flavonoids, in vitro protein digestibility, and glycemic potential of the flours changed dramatically.…”
Section: Digestibility Of Milletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average starch content of pearl, finger, foxtail, proso, barnyard, little, kodo millets ranges from 55-65%, 53-68%, 57-73%, 58-78%, 48-60%, 43-58%, 46-61% respectively [9]. In addition to differences in the starch content amylose content also varies in different millets ranging from 13-18% in pearl and finger millets and 1.38-12.35%, 2.24-38.67, 8.90-18.5, 11.9-18%, 15-18% in foxtail, proso, barnyard, little, and kodo millet respectively [10]. Furthermore, the average content of resistant starch also differs as 1.89-2%, 9-17%, 35-51%, 8-19%, 40-45%, 45-47%, 37-52% in finger, pearl, foxtail, proso, barnyard, little, and kodo millet respectively [11].…”
Section: Millet Starche -Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%