Effect of Social Interaction Based on Socio-Religions In Ensuring Security (Case Study: Capital City Police of Medan, Indonesia)

Abstract

Purpose this study to know Social interaction Chief of Capital City Police of Medan based on social religions in ensure security. This type of research is quantitative descriptive research. The population in this study were people in Medan City consisting of religious leaders, community leaders, academics and students. While the sample is a representative of the population whose results represent the overall symptoms observed. The sample in the study were 50 respondents. The sampling technique uses purposive random sampling.Social interaction has an important and necessary role in leadership by building heterogeneous unity and unity of society. For this reason, Chief of Capital City Police of Medan has made various efforts to maximize social interaction by conducting social religious activities with community leaders, religious leaders, youth leaders, academics, communities or organizations. This type of research is quantitative descriptive research. The population in this study were people in Medan City consisting of religious leaders, community leaders, academics and students. While the sample is a representative of the population whose results represent the overall symptoms observed. The sample in the study were 50 respondents. The sampling technique uses purposive random sampling. There is a positive and significant influence between social interaction with community security guarantees in the city of Medan. with t count> t table (3.968> 2.010635) at a significance of 5%. There is a positive socio-religions influence on security guarantees in the city of Medan with a t count of 3.566 greater than the table of 2.010635. There is a positive and significant influence between social and socio-religious interactions simultaneously on security guarantees in Medan City. This is seen from F count (6.372) greater than F table (2.565), at a significance of 5%.

The Problematics of the Implementation of the Dominus Litis

“…The sectoral ego appears to be a negative issue that cannot be denied. Dominus litis is only owned by the public prosecutor in terms of carrying out the process of prosecuting a criminal case, in addition, the investigator also actually has a dominus litis in terms of investigation and investigation (Hartanto & Hidayat, 2019). Each of these two institutions may not interfere with each other's duties, functions and authorities stipulated in the law.…”