2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of socio-demographic factors on the association between multimorbidity and healthcare costs: a population-based, retrospective cohort study

Abstract: ObjectivesTo estimate the attributable costs of multimorbidity and assess whether the association between the level of multimorbidity and health system costs varies by socio-demographic factors in young (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) adults living in Ontario, Canada.DesignA population-based, retrospective cohort studySettingThe province of Ontario, CanadaParticipants6 639 089 Ontarians who were diagnosed with at least one of 16 selected medical conditions on 1 April 2009.Main outcome measuresFrom the perspe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To ascertain comorbidities, we used validated algorithms developed at ICES to determine the prevalence of the following chronic conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [39], asthma [40], congestive heart failure (CHF) [41], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [42], dementia [43], diabetes [44], hypertension [45], HIV [46] and rheumatoid arthritis [47]. As with other multimorbidity studies [48,49], for conditions where a derived ICES cohort did not exist, we adopted a similar approach (i.e. the presence of any one inpatient hospital diagnostic code (DAD data) or two or more outpatient physician billing codes (OHIP data) within a 2 year period using relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes) to define the following chronic conditions: cardiac arrhythmia, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, renal failure, and stroke, as well as for mental health conditions and substance use disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ascertain comorbidities, we used validated algorithms developed at ICES to determine the prevalence of the following chronic conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [39], asthma [40], congestive heart failure (CHF) [41], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [42], dementia [43], diabetes [44], hypertension [45], HIV [46] and rheumatoid arthritis [47]. As with other multimorbidity studies [48,49], for conditions where a derived ICES cohort did not exist, we adopted a similar approach (i.e. the presence of any one inpatient hospital diagnostic code (DAD data) or two or more outpatient physician billing codes (OHIP data) within a 2 year period using relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes) to define the following chronic conditions: cardiac arrhythmia, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, renal failure, and stroke, as well as for mental health conditions and substance use disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the presence of any one inpatient hospital diagnostic code (DAD data) or two or more outpatient physician billing codes (OHIP data) within a 2 year period using relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes) to define the following chronic conditions: cardiac arrhythmia, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, renal failure, and stroke, as well as for mental health conditions and substance use disorders. (Appendix 1 in Table 3) [48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. We determined the prevalence of any cancer using the OCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 To obtain the best fit to our data, we use regression models and specified generalized linear models with a log link and γ distribution to estimate the incremental effect of hospital harm on length of index hospital stay, duration of PCE, and costs of PCE (following the approach and results of tests recommended by Manning and Mullahy 31 for cost). 32 Based on this regression, we estimated a prediction of each outcome in patients who did and did not experience hospital harm, and we used this difference to measure incremental outcomes. The difference between groups (those who experienced hospital harm and those who did not) was assessed via 2-tailed t tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ascertain comorbidities, we used validated algorithms developed at ICES to determine the prevalence of the following chronic conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [25], asthma [26], congestive heart failure (CHF) [27], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [28], dementia [29], diabetes [30], hypertension [31], HIV [32] and rheumatoid arthritis [33]. As with other multimorbidity studies [34,35], for conditions where a derived ICES cohort did not exist, we adopted a similar approach (i.e. the presence of any one inpatient hospital diagnostic code (DAD data) or two or more outpatient physician billing codes (OHIP data) within a 2 year period using relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes) to define the following chronic conditions: cardiac arrhythmia, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, renal failure, and stroke, as well as for mental health conditions and substance use disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Appendix 1). [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] We determined the prevalence of any cancer using the OCR. Liver failure and liver transplant were ascertained if one ICD9 or ICD10 code was billed in OHIP or DAD in the previous 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%