1998
DOI: 10.1080/00103629809370098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of soil properties on the kinetics of phosphate release

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, increasing K d is interpreted as increasing the rate of change in P desorption at a particular solution P concentration, as was observed for all levels of P loading when soil pH was raised to 7.1. Similar results can be found among the limited P desorption studies previously reported (He et al, 1994;De Smet et al, 1998).…”
Section: Soil Ph Effect On P Desorptionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, increasing K d is interpreted as increasing the rate of change in P desorption at a particular solution P concentration, as was observed for all levels of P loading when soil pH was raised to 7.1. Similar results can be found among the limited P desorption studies previously reported (He et al, 1994;De Smet et al, 1998).…”
Section: Soil Ph Effect On P Desorptionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The few that exist have obtained results ranging from increased P desorption with increasing pH (De Smet et al, 1998) to decreasing pH in others (Barrow, 2002). Rupa et al (2001) desorbed P from three Indian surface soils using six consecutive dilution extractions at pH values varying from 4.2 to 8.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative value would suggest that the soil was essentially saturated with P. At the low P concentration of equilibration solution (24 mg P kg -1 ), more P ended up in the equilibrated solution than in water showing that more P was released from the soil in the presence of P. However, the soil-bound P increased as the concentration of the equilibration solution increased. This suggests that a different mechanism for binding P occurred, possibly a chemical reaction, which produced a precipitate (De Smet et al 1998). This is supported by the limited and decreasing extraction with bicarbonate of the bound P as the equilibration treatment increased.…”
Section: Phosphatesupporting
confidence: 49%
“…McDowell and Sharpley (2003) believed that P desorption and diffusion from inside of soil particles probably was the rate limiting steps in short-and long term P release reactions, respectively. De Smet et al (1998) also related the initial fast and the final slow P release processes from noncalcareous soils to desorption and diffusion-dissolution reactions, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%