2018
DOI: 10.9734/acri/2018/41974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Soil Texture on Soil Infiltration Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this, rainfall was able to runoff into the watercourse, causing a quicker lag time and a higher peak. [84]. This may be an indication as to why the current HofE site peak flow is highe that of grassland, particularly in the winter.…”
Section: Antecedent Conditions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Due to this, rainfall was able to runoff into the watercourse, causing a quicker lag time and a higher peak. [84]. This may be an indication as to why the current HofE site peak flow is highe that of grassland, particularly in the winter.…”
Section: Antecedent Conditions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Grassland continually showing the greatest reduction in peak flow may have been influenced by several external factors. The grassland control site comprises of a sandier soil texture than the pedology of the other sample sites (with the exception of 2010, see Table 1), making it more permeable [84]. This means that when the grassland infiltration data are applied to the whole site to the represent grassland coverage, it is not accounting for variations in soil texture across the site [85][86][87].…”
Section: Antecedent Conditions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 10 cm datums were identified, and a line was measured from the base of the tree in the direction of least obstruction (i.e., no other trees, undergrowth, or shrubbery intruding the area) to mark the location of the 200 cm measurement locations; 50 cm was measured either side of the line to identify replica locations. Replication could not take place in the exact same location as the initial infiltration measurement, as any measurements would be skewed due to previous saturation of the soil; so, 50 cm was chosen to avoid lateral seepage (leading to the overestimation of infiltration values) [54][55][56]. The control site measurements were collected in a triangular pattern, with each replication being 50 cm from the last to avoid lateral seepage (Figure 3a and 3b).…”
Section: Sample Area and Infiltration Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%