2023
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2023.2206141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of solar radiation on pigmentation, phenolic content and antioxidant activity in ‘Forelle’ pears during fruit growth and ripening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al (2018) reported that the temperatures (average, minimum, and maximum) from April to October affect the most positively on the quality of the Fuji apple, followed by annual average temperature and sunlight, daily temperature difference, and total precipitation [32]. Yuri et al (2023) reported that when 'Forelle' pears were exposed to solar radiation energy, the total phenol content and antioxidant activity were higher than those of the control, and there was no difference in flesh firmness or total soluble solid content [43]. These studies confirm that the best growing conditions of plants and the environmental conditions with the highest content of secondary metabolites may not be the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2018) reported that the temperatures (average, minimum, and maximum) from April to October affect the most positively on the quality of the Fuji apple, followed by annual average temperature and sunlight, daily temperature difference, and total precipitation [32]. Yuri et al (2023) reported that when 'Forelle' pears were exposed to solar radiation energy, the total phenol content and antioxidant activity were higher than those of the control, and there was no difference in flesh firmness or total soluble solid content [43]. These studies confirm that the best growing conditions of plants and the environmental conditions with the highest content of secondary metabolites may not be the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%