1953
DOI: 10.1248/yakushi1947.73.9_911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Some Compounds on Tubercle Bacilli <i>in vitro</i>. VII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…21,42,43 The low efficacy of 3 against M. tuberculosis 44 and S. aureus 45 is in agreement with the results obtained in this study. The antimycobacterial potential of 2 reported half a century ago 46 could not be confirmed in this work; and although several reports over the last 60 years described the antibacterial activity of 1 , 2 and 4 against S. aureus . 20,47,48 2 was the only compound inhibiting S. aureus with an IC 50 of 32 μ M, which is lower than that previously reported.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21,42,43 The low efficacy of 3 against M. tuberculosis 44 and S. aureus 45 is in agreement with the results obtained in this study. The antimycobacterial potential of 2 reported half a century ago 46 could not be confirmed in this work; and although several reports over the last 60 years described the antibacterial activity of 1 , 2 and 4 against S. aureus . 20,47,48 2 was the only compound inhibiting S. aureus with an IC 50 of 32 μ M, which is lower than that previously reported.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Reported antimycobacterial activity of (+)-usnic acid ( 4 ) ranges from similar to 10 times lower potency. ,, The low efficacy of 3 against M. tuberculosis and S. aureus is in agreement with the results obtained in this study. The antimycobacterial potential of 2 reported half a century ago could not be confirmed in this work, although several reports over the last 60 years described the antibacterial activity of 1 , 2 , and 4 against S. aureus . ,, 2 was the only compound inhibiting S. aureus , with an IC 50 of 32 μM, which is lower than that previously reported . These discrepancies may stem from the use of different test systems and incompletely solubilized samples in biological assays.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%