1981
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1981.00340070081017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sorbitol on Psychomotor Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experience, mean test scores following acquisition generally range between 35 and 55 correct in 90 sec. With paperand-pencil versions of the test, higher (Bond & Lader, 1973;Schaeffer, Andrysiak, & Ungerleider, 1981), lower (McClain, Kromhout, Zieve, & Duane, 1981), and comparable (Eckhardt, Parker, Noble, Pautler, & Gottschalk, 1979;Kornetsky, 1951) scores have been reported under nondrug conditions. Of special relevance to this comparison are studies with the paper-and-pencil version of the DSST that showed not only scores comparable to those found using the present method, but similar acquisition curves for repeated administration as well (Wittenborn, Flaherty, McGough, Bossange, & Nash, 1976;Wittenborn, Flaherty, McGough, & Nash, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our experience, mean test scores following acquisition generally range between 35 and 55 correct in 90 sec. With paperand-pencil versions of the test, higher (Bond & Lader, 1973;Schaeffer, Andrysiak, & Ungerleider, 1981), lower (McClain, Kromhout, Zieve, & Duane, 1981), and comparable (Eckhardt, Parker, Noble, Pautler, & Gottschalk, 1979;Kornetsky, 1951) scores have been reported under nondrug conditions. Of special relevance to this comparison are studies with the paper-and-pencil version of the DSST that showed not only scores comparable to those found using the present method, but similar acquisition curves for repeated administration as well (Wittenborn, Flaherty, McGough, Bossange, & Nash, 1976;Wittenborn, Flaherty, McGough, & Nash, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the main processor ofingested compounds, the liver might be expected to encounter sorbitol. However, orally ingested sorbitol is poorly absorbed in man and animals, and products ofits metabolism by intestinal microorganisms, rather than sorbitol itself, are absorbed (13,14). Nevertheless, sorbitol entering the liver could be oxidized by hepatic sorbitol dehydrogenase in the same way that ethanol is oxidized by alcohol dehydrogenase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 McClain et at report an improvement in psychomotor tests in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis following administration ofsorbitol. 6 In theory it is clear that sorbitol might be expected to .be as effective as lactulose in the treatment of PSE. However, in order to assess whether this is the case, a large double-blind clinical trial is required to compare equal doses (dry weight) of sorbitol and lactulose in the treatment of PSE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in vitro experiment demonstrated that faecal bacteria metabolised sorbitol, resulting in faecal acidification and reduction in faecal ammonia concentration 5 . This was followed by studies utilising the “Hydrogen Breath Test” which prove conclusively that sorbitol is metabolised in the gut 6 , 7 , 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation