2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of SOS-induced levels of imuABC on spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis in Caulobacter crescentus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent studies have shown the emergence of de novo mutations, after the exposure of bacteria in non-lethal stress conditions [8]. This event is known as “adaptative resistance” [9,10], and it is related to the triggering of the SOS system, which leads to increased rates of recombination and mutation, affecting the evolution and dissemination of bacterial resistance [11,12]. This event is known as “adaptative resistance” [9,10], and it is related to the triggering of the SOS system, which leads to increased rates of recombination and mutation, affecting the evolution and dissemination of bacterial resistance [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have shown the emergence of de novo mutations, after the exposure of bacteria in non-lethal stress conditions [8]. This event is known as “adaptative resistance” [9,10], and it is related to the triggering of the SOS system, which leads to increased rates of recombination and mutation, affecting the evolution and dissemination of bacterial resistance [11,12]. This event is known as “adaptative resistance” [9,10], and it is related to the triggering of the SOS system, which leads to increased rates of recombination and mutation, affecting the evolution and dissemination of bacterial resistance [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that ImuB and ImuC act cooperatively during TLS in several bacterial species (Boshoff et al ; Le Chatelier et al ; Galhardo et al ; Warner et al ; Alves et al ). Based on sequence analyses, Warner et al () suggested that ImuB is devoid of DNA polymerase activity because it lacks the highly conserved residues of the active site required to polymerize DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with Pol II and Pol IV, Pol V catalyzes DNA synthesis with the lowest fidelity and is the main enzyme for bacterial SOS-induced mutations (Fuchs et al, 2004;Goodman & Woodgate, 2013;Jaszczur et al, 2016). However, only approximately one third (1,707 strains) of the sequenced bacteria (5,360 strains, KEGG data in Jan 2020) encodes Pol V. In those strains without Pol V, nearly a half (1,699 strains) contains DnaE2 (ImuC in some publications) protein that has been shown to play a key role in SOS mutagenesis (Abella et al, 2004;Alves et al, 2017;Baker & Kornberg, 1998;Boshoff et al, 2003;Erill et al, 2006;Galhardo et al, 2005;Tsai et al, 2012;Timinskas et al, 2014;Warner et al, 2010). DnaE2 is a structural homolog of DnaE1 subunit of replicative DNA polymerase III.…”
Section: E Coli Contains Three Different Tls Polymerases Pol II (Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imuA and imuB genes, usually located in the SOS-regulated operon of imuA-imuB-dnaE2, are required for DnaE2 mutagenesis (Abella et al, 2004;Alves et al, 2017;Erill et al, 2006;Galhardo et al, 2005). The imuA or imuB mutants of Caulobacter crescentus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis showed a significant reduction in SOS-induced mutation frequency, similar to that of the dnaE2 mutants (Galhardo et al, 2005;Warner et al, 2010).…”
Section: E Coli Contains Three Different Tls Polymerases Pol II (Pomentioning
confidence: 99%