2021
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11100926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Source–Sink Ratio Manipulation on Growth, Flowering, and Yield Potential of Soybean

Abstract: Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in soybean require resource availability manipulations. Decapitation and reducing sink strength through deflowering can affect the source–sink ratio that affects plant growth, development, and yield. The current study assesses the effect of decapitation (Decap) and removal of the two lowest racemes (R2LR) and their combination on growth, flowering, and yield capacity of soybean through controlling the source–sink ratio and inducing the “stay-green” phenotype. Two fiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agricultural crops are confronted by a number of abiotic stress factors that limit their productivity [1][2][3][4][5]. Among abiotic stresses, chilling stress is one of the most severe stresses, which substantially inhibits the seed germination and seedlings development [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural crops are confronted by a number of abiotic stress factors that limit their productivity [1][2][3][4][5]. Among abiotic stresses, chilling stress is one of the most severe stresses, which substantially inhibits the seed germination and seedlings development [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly taller plants were observed with control (109.28 cm) compared to early and late clipping treatments (100.10 and 100.43 cm). The reduction in the plant height with terminal bud clipping might be due to the effect of breaking the apical dominance, whereas the taller plant growth in control might be due to the continuous supply of auxin to meristematic tissues (Venkadachalam, 2003; Kokilavani et al., 2007; Ibrahim et al., 2021; Kocjan Acko et al., 2019; Siddagangamma et al., 2018). As in terminal clipping practice, the apical bud is removed, and so the utilization of the photosynthates by the crop for lateral branches could be higher, and this might be the reason for decreased plant height.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early clipping treatment resulted in the lowest pod height of 10.75 cm compared to control and late clipping treatments (Table 2), suggesting that the removal of the terminal bud might have activated dormant axillary buds forming new lateral branches and shoots (Ibrahim et al., 2021), resulting in the lowest pod height. Though there was no significant difference in plant height between early and late clipping, the plants were slightly shorter with early clipping, which might have resulted in pods developing low (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study recommended the use of 150 mgL −1 6-BAP as part of the irrigation program to compensate reduced water supply of up to 80% of crop evapotranspiration in soybean. Other studies that have exploited 6-BAP due to its crucial role in soybean plant growth and development include Abdallah (2020), Mangena (2020), Ibrahim et al (2021), and Amoanimaa-Dede et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%