2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of specimen thickness on growth of real contact area of rubber with two-dimensional regular wavy surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the real contact area increases with increasing surface pressures, as already investigated in literature [6] [14] [15]. Further Figure 13 shows the real contact area is decreasing with increasing hardness.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Contact Areasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As expected, the real contact area increases with increasing surface pressures, as already investigated in literature [6] [14] [15]. Further Figure 13 shows the real contact area is decreasing with increasing hardness.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Contact Areasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[21,22] Rubinstein et al [5] believed that for the contact of the surface with small roughness (RMS < 0.1 µm), the nonlinear phenomenon might be related to the evanescent wave, and the measurement error of contact area would be caused by the tunneling effect [27] of light when the real contact area was measured based on the total reflection method. Different from the analysis of Rubinstein et al, Matsuda et al [24,25] compared the effects of vacuum, dry and wet environment on real contact area, and found that the relationship between real contact area and normal load would be related to the existence of fluid between contact interface. The smaller the compression ratio of fluid, the slower the growth rate of real contact area with normal load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the contrary, if there is no fluid in the contact interface, the relationship between real contact area and normal load tends to be linear. [24,25] The comparison of the results between WFT and AFT show that, the resistance of fluid between the contact interfaces is an important factor that leads to the slow growth of the contact area.…”
Section: Experiments Of Nonlinear Phenomenon Of Real Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mastsuda, in 2014, used an in-situ method to observe the real contact area between two-dimensional regular surface and a flat surface, and found that the growth speed of the real contact area drops sharply after the contact spots touch the neighbors, and then the real contact area keep almost constant reaching the complete contact [17]. After then, he did the same experiment in the wet environments, and found the saturated contact area fraction is far smaller than one [18]. Buchner in 2009 give a new numerical method to simulate the real contact area under normal load considering the material properties and real asperity slopes, he obtained the non-linear area load curve, which approaches to complete contact under heavy load [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%