2017
DOI: 10.1177/0954410017717287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of standoff distance and area ratio on the performance of circular exhaust ejector using computational fluid dynamics

Abstract: Numerical investigation is carried out to study the effect of standoff distance and area ratio on mass entrainment of an air-air circular exhaust ejector. Nozzle and mixing tube are the two components of an ejector, and for the present study, circular cross section shape has been chosen. Numerical simulations have been carried out at Reynolds number in the range of 6.85 Â 10 4 and 4.11 Â 10 5. Area ratio is varied between 1.25 < area ratio < 4 and standoff distance is varied from 1D nz < standoff distance < 4D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies on a standalone ejector [14][15][16][17] have reported the optimum length of the standoff distance to be in the range 0:8D nz < L sd < 2D nz . More recently, Singh et al 18 conducted a numerical study on a standalone air-air ejector and reported L sd ¼ 2:25D nz and AR mx ¼ 2.25 as the optimum values for higher mass entrainment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar studies on a standalone ejector [14][15][16][17] have reported the optimum length of the standoff distance to be in the range 0:8D nz < L sd < 2D nz . More recently, Singh et al 18 conducted a numerical study on a standalone air-air ejector and reported L sd ¼ 2:25D nz and AR mx ¼ 2.25 as the optimum values for higher mass entrainment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Singh et al. 18 conducted a numerical study on a standalone air-air ejector and reported Lsd=2.25Dnz and AR mx = 2.25 as the optimum values for higher mass entrainment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%