1968
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.215.1.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of starvation on the tissue composition of the small intestine in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
52
0
3

Year Published

1976
1976
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In good agreement with a previous report that fasting causes a decrease in intestinal weight [19], we found that the mucosal weight decreased after 3 days of fasting and increased very quickly after refeeding. The response of refeeding seemed to be more rapid than that of fasting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In good agreement with a previous report that fasting causes a decrease in intestinal weight [19], we found that the mucosal weight decreased after 3 days of fasting and increased very quickly after refeeding. The response of refeeding seemed to be more rapid than that of fasting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is reported that mucosal cell proliferation in crypts is greatly influenced by fasting in rats. Number of mucosal cells, DNA content, and mucosal uptake of [3H]thymidine were shown to be reduced as was the migration rate of cells up to the villous tip [19][20][21]. Therefore, the entire surface area of the j ej unal vill us was much smaller in fasted than in control animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The present study confirms these observations. Steiner et al (1968) starved rats for 6 days and showed that the small intestine lost weight faster than the body as a whole; the present experiment indicated that this was true when the dietary restriction imposed was less severe but was of longer duration.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…McCracken (1984) and McCracken and Kelly (1984) suggested that villous atrophy and reductions in digestive enzyme activity after weaning may be related more to the lack of a continuous supply of substrate than to any antigenicity of the diet or inherently low levels of disaccharidase activity. In rodents and miniature piglets a period of food restriction (Steiner, Bourges, Freedman and Gray, 1968;McManus and Isselbacher, 1970;Altmann, 1972), or exclusion of nutrients from the gut when animals were fed parenterally (McNeill and Hamilton, 1971;Shulman, Fiorotto, Sheng and Garza, 1984;Goldstein, Hebiguchi, Luk, Taqi, Guilarte, Franklin, Niemiec and Dudgeon, 1985;Castillo, Feng, Stevenson, Kerner and Kwong, 1990), resulted in villous atrophy and decreases in mucosal protein content and digestive enzyme activity. These findings suggest a direct role for the presence of nutrients in the lumen for the maintenance of gut structure and function after weaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%