Effect of Stereo Deficiencies on Virtual Distal Pointing

Exploring Users Pointing Performance on Large Displays with Different Curvatures in Virtual Reality

“…They did not notice any difference in pointing between AR and VR headsets -which contradicts [37,51]. All the previous studies evaluated pointing performance [5,6,15,26,58] in a 3D environment rendered via an HMD. We did not find any work focusing on virtual surfaces (flat or curved) rendering interactive and selectable 2D content such as a virtual display inside the virtual environment.…”

“…They also found that the perceived workload with gaze pointing was lower than with head pointing. Batmaz et al [5] explored distal pointing and found that targets placed at the focal distance of a VR headset (0.75m in the case of HTC VIVE) have higher throughput compared to target placed outside the focal distance (further than 0.75m). Batmaz et al [6] used Fitts' law for pointing tasks in AR and VR where users had to move a motiontracked wand to point at virtual objects in two movement directions: view direction (i.e., front-to-back movements in the forward direction of where the user is facing) and lateral direction (i.e., pointing left and right).…”

Exploring Users' Pointing Performance on Virtual and Physical Large Curved Displays

“…These studies revealed that users' performance is significantly affected by target width and amplitude (i.e., the distance between two targets in meters or pixels). Previous studies [6,7,14,23,60] on target selection in VR evaluated pointing performance using Fitts law in a 3D environment rendered via an HMD. These studies in VR also concluded that user performance primarily depends on target widths and amplitudes.…”