2022
DOI: 10.1121/10.0012763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of stimulation parameters on sequential current-steered stimuli in cochlear implants

Abstract: Manipulation of cochlear implant (CI) place pitch was carried out with current steering by stimulating two CI electrodes sequentially. The objective was to investigate whether shifts in activated neural populations could be achieved to produce salient pitch differences and to determine which stimulation parameters would be more effective in steering of current. These were the pulse rate and pulse width of electrical stimuli and the distance between the two current-steering electrodes. Nine CI users participate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite different designs that attempt to address different issues, outcomes are similar across electrode designs and speech processors [3]. For example, current focusing and current steering methods are used to mitigate the effect of current spread [9,10], some electrode designs target deep insertions to ensure that the low-frequency region of the cochlea is stimulated [11] and electrode array positioning is either perimodiolar or against the cochlear lateral wall [12]. These different designs have not solved the problem of variable outcomes across CI users [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite different designs that attempt to address different issues, outcomes are similar across electrode designs and speech processors [3]. For example, current focusing and current steering methods are used to mitigate the effect of current spread [9,10], some electrode designs target deep insertions to ensure that the low-frequency region of the cochlea is stimulated [11] and electrode array positioning is either perimodiolar or against the cochlear lateral wall [12]. These different designs have not solved the problem of variable outcomes across CI users [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%