2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of street pattern on the severity of crashes involving vulnerable road users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many earlier injury severity studies have used such a specification to appropriately recognize the ordinal nature of the injury severity levels (see, for example, Xie et al, 2009, Christoforou et al, 2010, Haleem and Abdel-Aty, 2010, Quddus et al, 2010, Jung et al, 2010, Zhu and Srinivasan, 2011. In recent years, unordered-response specifications have also been considered (see, for example, Rifaat et al, 2011, Yan et al, 2011, Malyshkina and Mannering, 2009, Huang et al, 2008, Milton et al, 2008, Kim et al, 2010, and Moore et al, 2011. These unordered-response specifications, while not recognizing the ordinal nature of injury severity levels, provide additional flexibility in capturing variable effects and are also less vulnerable to parameter inconsistency problems caused by varying under-reporting rates (across injury severity levels) in the data (see Ye and Lord, 2011).…”
Section: Current Study In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many earlier injury severity studies have used such a specification to appropriately recognize the ordinal nature of the injury severity levels (see, for example, Xie et al, 2009, Christoforou et al, 2010, Haleem and Abdel-Aty, 2010, Quddus et al, 2010, Jung et al, 2010, Zhu and Srinivasan, 2011. In recent years, unordered-response specifications have also been considered (see, for example, Rifaat et al, 2011, Yan et al, 2011, Malyshkina and Mannering, 2009, Huang et al, 2008, Milton et al, 2008, Kim et al, 2010, and Moore et al, 2011. These unordered-response specifications, while not recognizing the ordinal nature of injury severity levels, provide additional flexibility in capturing variable effects and are also less vulnerable to parameter inconsistency problems caused by varying under-reporting rates (across injury severity levels) in the data (see Ye and Lord, 2011).…”
Section: Current Study In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another structure that has seen substantial use in injury severity analysis is the unordered-response (UR) model structure, including the multinomial logit model or the sequential binary choice model (see Shankar and Mannering, 1996, Ulfarsson and Mannering, 2004, Khorashadi et al, 2005, Rifaat et al, 2011, and Yan et al, 2011, the Markov switching multinomial logit model (Malyshkina and Mannering, 2009), and the nested logit model (Savolainen and Mannering, 2007, Huang et al, 2008, Hu and Donnell, 2010, Patil et al, 2012). …”
Section: Injury Severity Analysis: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multinomial Logit , Carson and Mannering (2001), Abdel-Aty and Abdelwahab (2004), Ulfarsson and Mannering (2004), Khorashadi et al (2005), Islam and Mannering (2006), Kim et al (2007), Malyshkina and Mannering (2008), Savolainen and Ghosh (2008), Schneider et al (2009), Malyshkina and, Rifaat et al (2011), Ye and Lord (2011a, b), Schneider and Savolainen (forthcoming) (Continued)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%