Effect of stress on safety‐critical behaviour: An examination of combined resilience engineering and naturalistic decision‐making approaches

Abstract

Combining the conceptual tools and methods of resilience engineering (RE) with naturalistic decision-making (NDM), in the context of police critical incident command, this study explores the capacity of individual commanders to manage occupational stress during a critical incident or crisis. A case scenario and interviews, together with cognitive task analysis (CTA), are used to investigate how stress affects decision making and performance. The analysis shows: (1) As a social process, sensemaking goes beyond an individual's cognitive capacity. It depends on teams and involves collaboration, sharing and assessing risks and uncertainties. (2) In terms of improvisation, decision-making requires organisational support in training and authorisation. (3) The mechanisms that ensure the synchronisation of activities link to an operational communication strategy grounded on transparency and trust between the parties involved. (4) Individual adaptive capacity also has organisational characteristics. It improves by facilitating and stimulating proactive learning across the organisation. Bringing RE and NDM together, clarifies interdependencies. Thus, the gap between the organisational system and the individual's performance might be closed, which improves performances at the sharp end by a feedback loop that reconciles bottom-up and top-down views.

Business continuity and resilience management: A conceptual framework

“…All these aspects in a BCM system can be categorised into three main domains: i) strategic planning to achieve the goals of an organisation ii) monitoring and measuring achievement iii) anticipation activities, risk management and control system However, adversity, stress and reduced functionality that typically relate to the treatment of uncertainties (Steen & Pollock, 2022) are not explicitly reflected in standard BCM systems.…”

“…However, adversity, stress and reduced functionality that typically relate to the treatment of uncertainties (Steen & Pollock, 2022) are not explicitly reflected in standard BCM systems. In addition to uncertainty in operational environments, Whyte et al (2022) point to the ethical dimension of decision‐making when choosing technologies and growing organisational complexity with multiple actors.…”