OBJECTIVE:To study the educational contributions of attending physicians in an internal medicine house staff ambulatory clinic.
DESIGN:Cross-sectional, self-administered survey.SETTING: University-affiliated general internal medicine practice.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Internal medicine residents and attendings.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Attending and resident perceptions of whether attendings made contributions to teaching points, diagnosis (DX), therapy (RX), and health care maintenance (HCM) were assessed in 428 patient encounters. Resident assessments significantly exceeded attending self-assessments of contributions to teaching points (82% vs 74%, P =.001), DX (44% vs 34%, P =.001), RX (61% vs 55%, P =.02), and HCM (19% vs 15%, P =.04). Both residents and attendings perceived that contributions declined progressively with increasing resident year (Po.05). Primary care and categorical residents assessed attending contributions comparably. However, attendings perceived contributing more to RX and HCM for categorical residents than primary care (Po.05). Male and female residents assessed attending contributions comparably. However, attendings perceived contributing generally more to DX in male residents than female (P =.003). In 8% of encounters, either residents or attendings felt that patient evaluation by the attending was needed. In these encounters with personal patient evaluation by attendings, both residents and attendings felt that attendings made more contributions to DX (P =.001) and teaching points than in other encounters.
CONCLUSIONS:Attending physicians consistently underestimate their perceived contributions to house officer ambulatory teaching. Their personal patient evaluation increases assistance with DX and teaching points. Given perceived declining contributions by training year, attendings may need to identify other teaching strategies for interactions with senior residents. I n recent years, medical education has increasingly emphasized training in ambulatory medical practice sites. 1 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education now specifies that 25% of all training be in ambulatory sites. 2 Program objectives and formats for ambulatory care training have been described. 2-5 However, there is little information about the effectiveness of attending teaching contributions in ambulatory medical education. Nor is there substantial information regarding the educational experience and learning outcomes of medical residents in these settings. 6,7 In contrast to hospital inpatient settings where faculty members, subspecialty fellows, students, and senior residents all contribute to teaching, the ambulatory setting generally consists of brief, 1-on-1 interactions between attending and trainee while patients are waiting. Furthermore, discussion time may be devoted to only the most acute medical problems, and neither the attending nor the resident can prepare ahead of time for the clinical discussion, as patient problems may be unpredictable and data may be incomplete. 8 These differenc...