Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Prior meta-analyses have established the potential of intravenous ketamine in safeguarding against neurocognitive impairment, but the efficacy of intravenous esketamine for the prevention of perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) remains uncertain. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of esketamine on PND in adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods We searched several electronic databases and clinical trial registries to find relevant trials. Randomized controlled trials of perioperative use of esketamine adjuvant were included in the analysis. The main outcome measured was the risk of postoperative delirium(POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Secondary outcomes included the assessment of postoperative cognitive status, pain scores (VAS/NRS), remifentanil consumption and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Results Thirteen studies encompassing procedures such as abdominal, thoracoscopic lung, gastrointestinal, laparoscopic gynecological, spinal surgery, and modified radical mastectomy, were included in the analysis. A cohort comprising 1068 adult patients underwent general anesthesia, with 584 patients assigned to the esketamine group and 484 patients designated to the placebo group. The administration of general anesthesia was augmented by intravenous infusion of esketamine, and a comparative analysis was conducted in relation to alternative pharmacological interventions or a placebo. The application of esketamine during the perioperative period was observed to decrease the risk of POD ( RR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.66, p < 0.0001, GRADE = High) and exhibited a protective influence on POCD (RR = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.84, p = 0.009, I 2 = 0%, GRADE = Moderate). Significant improvements were observed at 4, 24 and 48 h post-surgery when comparing esketamine to a placebo (4 h: SMD -0.78, 95% CI: -1.24, -0.32, p = 0.0009, I 2 = 58%, GRADE = Low; 24 h: SMD -0.92, 95% CI: -1.40, -0.44, p = 0.0002, I2 = 86%, GRADE = Low; 48 h: SMD -0.9, 95% CI: -1.68, -0.12, p = 0.02, I 2 = 89%, GRADE = Low), and intraoperative remifentanil consumption was significantly reduced in the esketamine group (SMD -0.56; 95%CI: − 0.86, − 0.27, p = 0.0002, I 2 = 62%, GRADE = moderate). A notable reduction in the risk of PONV was observed in the esketamine group(RR = 0.64; 95%CI: 0.49, 0.84, p = 0.001, I 2 = 0%, GRADE = High). Conclusion The use of intravenous esketamine as an adjuvant in general anesthesia may represent ...
Background Prior meta-analyses have established the potential of intravenous ketamine in safeguarding against neurocognitive impairment, but the efficacy of intravenous esketamine for the prevention of perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) remains uncertain. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of esketamine on PND in adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods We searched several electronic databases and clinical trial registries to find relevant trials. Randomized controlled trials of perioperative use of esketamine adjuvant were included in the analysis. The main outcome measured was the risk of postoperative delirium(POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Secondary outcomes included the assessment of postoperative cognitive status, pain scores (VAS/NRS), remifentanil consumption and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Results Thirteen studies encompassing procedures such as abdominal, thoracoscopic lung, gastrointestinal, laparoscopic gynecological, spinal surgery, and modified radical mastectomy, were included in the analysis. A cohort comprising 1068 adult patients underwent general anesthesia, with 584 patients assigned to the esketamine group and 484 patients designated to the placebo group. The administration of general anesthesia was augmented by intravenous infusion of esketamine, and a comparative analysis was conducted in relation to alternative pharmacological interventions or a placebo. The application of esketamine during the perioperative period was observed to decrease the risk of POD ( RR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.66, p < 0.0001, GRADE = High) and exhibited a protective influence on POCD (RR = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.84, p = 0.009, I 2 = 0%, GRADE = Moderate). Significant improvements were observed at 4, 24 and 48 h post-surgery when comparing esketamine to a placebo (4 h: SMD -0.78, 95% CI: -1.24, -0.32, p = 0.0009, I 2 = 58%, GRADE = Low; 24 h: SMD -0.92, 95% CI: -1.40, -0.44, p = 0.0002, I2 = 86%, GRADE = Low; 48 h: SMD -0.9, 95% CI: -1.68, -0.12, p = 0.02, I 2 = 89%, GRADE = Low), and intraoperative remifentanil consumption was significantly reduced in the esketamine group (SMD -0.56; 95%CI: − 0.86, − 0.27, p = 0.0002, I 2 = 62%, GRADE = moderate). A notable reduction in the risk of PONV was observed in the esketamine group(RR = 0.64; 95%CI: 0.49, 0.84, p = 0.001, I 2 = 0%, GRADE = High). Conclusion The use of intravenous esketamine as an adjuvant in general anesthesia may represent ...
Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of combining esketamine with sufentanil for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients undergoing elective impacted tooth surgery or open reduction and internal fixation. Methods In this single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, parallel-controlled trial, 91 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group (group ES, n = 46) received a combination of sufentanil 1.5 µg/kg and esketamine 1.0 mg/kg, while the control group (group S, n = 45) received sufentanil 2 µg/kg alone for PCIA after surgery. Primary outcome was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for patients at rest and during mouth opening at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, patient satisfaction with analgesia, and the occurrence of adverse events within 48 h post-surgery. The frequency of PCIA button presses and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were also recorded. Results The resting VAS scores and the mouth-opening VAS scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-surgery were significantly lower in Group ES than in Group S ( P < 0.05). Additionally, the RSS scores were significantly higher at 6 h ( P = 0.032) and 12 h ( P = 0.021) post-surgery in Group ES. The frequency of PCIA postoperative use within 48 h post-surgery decreased ( P = 0.021) in Group ES, while satisfaction with analgesia and QoR-15 scores increased ( P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The incidences of postoperative dizziness and nausea/vomiting reduced ( P = 0.045 and P = 0.036, respectively) in Group ES, but one adverse event of nightmare was observed. There was no significant difference in rescue analgesia between the two groups. Conclusion The use of esketamine combined with sufentanil in patients undergoing third molar surgery and maxillofacial trauma can alleviate short-term postoperative pain, and improve the quality of postoperative recovery. Esketamine is worth promoting in the clinical application of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered in chictr.org.cn with the identifier: ChiCTR2400086662 on 08/07/2024. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-024-05273-8.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.