1984
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.93.4.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of subliminal symbiotic activation on hypnotic rapport and susceptibility.

Abstract: This article is based on the first author's doctoral dissertation in clinical psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at Ohio University. The dissertation was conducted under the direction of the second authorWe gratefully acknowledge the assistance of John

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects in these studies have been exposed to the stimulus several times per week for the duration of treatment with significant improvement beyond their counterparts in the same programs who were exposed to the control stimulus. Besides symptom improvement, exposure to the symbiotic-like stimulus has been shown to facilitate self-disclosure (Linehan & O'Toole, 1982), enhance rapport (Frauman, Lynn, Hardaway, & Molteni, 1984), improve performance of assertive behavior (Packer, 1984), and improve academic performance and study habits (Ariam & Siller, 1982; Bryant-Tuckett & Silverman, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects in these studies have been exposed to the stimulus several times per week for the duration of treatment with significant improvement beyond their counterparts in the same programs who were exposed to the control stimulus. Besides symptom improvement, exposure to the symbiotic-like stimulus has been shown to facilitate self-disclosure (Linehan & O'Toole, 1982), enhance rapport (Frauman, Lynn, Hardaway, & Molteni, 1984), improve performance of assertive behavior (Packer, 1984), and improve academic performance and study habits (Ariam & Siller, 1982; Bryant-Tuckett & Silverman, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, that issue has been theorized in terms of transference and object relations (Brown & Fromm, 1986;Smith, 1981), working alliance and empathy (Palaci, 1993;Petot, 2006); motivation and social influence (Kihlstrom, 1985;Orne, 1966;Spanos, 1982), regression and symbiosis (Frauman, Lynn, Hardaway, & Molteni, 1984;Lutz & Fix, 2007) to name just a few.…”
Section: Integrative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of evidence suggests that nonresponsive hypnotic subjects may actively and purposefully resist responding to hypnotic suggestions (Jones & Spanos, 1982; Lynn, Weekes, Rhue, & Snodgrass, 1985; Spanos & Bodorik, 1977). Further, interpersonal and rapport factors appear to be related to positive hypnotic involvement and response (Dolby & Sheehan, 1977; Frauman, Lynn, Hardaway, & Molteni, 1984; Lynn, Nash, Rhue, Frauman, & Sweeney, 1984; Lynn, Snodgrass, Hardaway, & Casey, 1984; Nash, Lynn, Stanley, Frauman, & Rhue, 1985; Sheehan, 1980). Clinicians who place a premium on maximizing the effects of hypnotic interventions have consistently argued that minimizing resistance and augmenting rapport with the hypnotist are prerequisites to fostering complete hypnotic involvement (Barber, 1985; Diamond, 1986; Lankton, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%