2020
DOI: 10.3354/aei00350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substrate type and pellet age on the resuspension of Atlantic salmon faecal material

Abstract: The influence of substrate type and particle age on the remobilization of settled Atlantic salmon Salmo salar faecal material was studied through a set of controlled experiments in horizontal flow flumes, simulating different bottom conditions present in fish-farming locations along the coast of Norway. There was no significant effect of pellet age on remobilization for up to 1 week old faecal material, but critical shear stresses (τc) and velocities required for resuspending faecal pellets were strongly depen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resuspension can pick up previously settled particles and redistribute them over larger areas, thus decreasing organic-matter accumulation and its ecological effects near cages (Keeley et al, 2013;Broch et al, 2017). A seabed's sensitivity to resuspension depends greatly on substrate type and texture (Law et al, 2016;Carvajalino-Ferna ´ndez et al, 2020a), as well as vertical structure, disturbance history and, for sediment substrates, resident biota (Sanford, 2008). Dispersion models with spatially explicit sediment resuspension parameters have been found to be more accurate than those with constant default resuspension parameters or those that ignore resuspension (Carvajalino-Ferna ´ndez et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Modelling Limits and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resuspension can pick up previously settled particles and redistribute them over larger areas, thus decreasing organic-matter accumulation and its ecological effects near cages (Keeley et al, 2013;Broch et al, 2017). A seabed's sensitivity to resuspension depends greatly on substrate type and texture (Law et al, 2016;Carvajalino-Ferna ´ndez et al, 2020a), as well as vertical structure, disturbance history and, for sediment substrates, resident biota (Sanford, 2008). Dispersion models with spatially explicit sediment resuspension parameters have been found to be more accurate than those with constant default resuspension parameters or those that ignore resuspension (Carvajalino-Ferna ´ndez et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Modelling Limits and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical bed shear stress is one of the main thresholds for resuspension, which depends strongly on substrate roughness and material type. Specifically, smooth substrates typically require lower critical stresses for material resuspension than rough surfaces [75], while the critical shear stress also varies greatly among different particulate materials with varying size and cohesiveness. For instance, smaller-sized particulates tend to have lower resuspension thresholds, and resistance to resuspension increases with increasing cohesiveness, consolidation and biostabilization of the benthic sediment layer [63,76].…”
Section: Transport and Transformation Processes At The Seabed Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%