2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of subsurface drainage on water balance and water table in poorly drained paddy fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The layout of the drainage treatments for the experiment is given in Figure 2. Further details about the experimental design can be found in [16]. The soil texture of the experimental site is specified in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The layout of the drainage treatments for the experiment is given in Figure 2. Further details about the experimental design can be found in [16]. The soil texture of the experimental site is specified in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 2014 year, the total rainfall was only 461 mm. The paddy fields were consolidated in 2003, and the plots were regulated as rectangular shape with the same area [16]. The standard plot size of a consolidated rice field is 0.3 ha, 100 m long and 30 m wide [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different responses of the water table profile to drainage are related to specific flow patterns in paddy fields. Puddling, a traditional practice in paddy fields for controlling percolation losses, causes the formation of a less conductive soil layer (a hardpan) below a plow pan (Darzi-Naftchali et al, 2013). This layer causes water to horizontally flow from between the drains to the backfilled trench in a surface soil layer and then vertically into the drains (Ogino and Ota, 2007 …”
Section: Water Table Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basal fertilizers were applied before rice transplanting as follows: 140 kg ha −1 triple superphosphate in 2011; 100 kg ha −1 triple superphosphate, 100 kg ha −1 potassium sulfate, and 80 kg ha −1 urea in 2014; and 50 kg ha −1 triple superphosphate, 50 kg ha −1 potassium sulfate, and 100 kg ha While the usual water management practice for local rice fields is continuous flooding as it helps control weeds and pests Âr and s are the residual and saturated water contents, respectively, Ks is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, b is bulk density and ␣, n, and l are the shape factors in the van Genuchten-Mualem model (van Genuchten, 1980). (Darzi-Naftchali et al, 2013), two types of water managements were followed during this experiment: midseason drainage (MSD) and alternative wetting and drying (AWD). Under both managements, the plots were continuously flooded (with about 5 cm of standing water) during 3-4 weeks after transplanting, and suitable conditions for harvesting were created by end-season drainage several days before the harvest.…”
Section: Field Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%