1958
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-195801000-00039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Succinylcholine on Intraocular Pressure in Human Beings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have reported the absence of a relationship (Churchill-Davidson, 1954;Morris and Dunn, 1959;Lamoreaux and Urbach, 1960;Halldin and Palmer, 1961). The relationships between the magnitude of fasciculations and increased intraocular pressure (Schwartz and DeRoetth, 1958;Meyers et al, 1978) increased intragastric pressure (LaCour, 1970), arrhythmia (Winter and Ahnefeld, 1974) and electromyographic recordings (Collier, 1975) also remain controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have reported the absence of a relationship (Churchill-Davidson, 1954;Morris and Dunn, 1959;Lamoreaux and Urbach, 1960;Halldin and Palmer, 1961). The relationships between the magnitude of fasciculations and increased intraocular pressure (Schwartz and DeRoetth, 1958;Meyers et al, 1978) increased intragastric pressure (LaCour, 1970), arrhythmia (Winter and Ahnefeld, 1974) and electromyographic recordings (Collier, 1975) also remain controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When succinylcholine is given in small doses the rise in tension depends on the size of the dose, but after a maximum rise has been attained, the dose size infhences only the duration of the raised tension (8,11,13). Yet, it is stated (16) that continuous drip of succinylcholine in combination with pentothal(thi0mebumalnatrium)-N;?O-O~ gives the same rise as a single dose, but the tension will fall again to basal values despite continued infusion. (Nothing is stated of the depth of the anaesthesia).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%