2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sucrose concentrations on somatic embryogenesis in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
24
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the hydrolytic enzyme "invertase" in plant cell wall and vacuole that breaks down sucrose into glucose and fructose for plant metabolism may be responsible for the superiority of sucrose over other carbon sources (Arnd and Guo-Qing, 1999). The superiority of sucrose over the other sugars employed as carbon source in this study is consistent with earlier reports for other plants such as Phoenix dactylifera (Veramendi and Navarro, 1996;Othmani et al, 2009) used as a sole carbon source and Dianthus caryophyllus (Karami et al, 2006). Baskaran and Jayabalan (2005) suggested that among the three carbon sources, sucrose proved to be better than fructose or glucose for shoot regeneration of Eclipta alba.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The presence of the hydrolytic enzyme "invertase" in plant cell wall and vacuole that breaks down sucrose into glucose and fructose for plant metabolism may be responsible for the superiority of sucrose over other carbon sources (Arnd and Guo-Qing, 1999). The superiority of sucrose over the other sugars employed as carbon source in this study is consistent with earlier reports for other plants such as Phoenix dactylifera (Veramendi and Navarro, 1996;Othmani et al, 2009) used as a sole carbon source and Dianthus caryophyllus (Karami et al, 2006). Baskaran and Jayabalan (2005) suggested that among the three carbon sources, sucrose proved to be better than fructose or glucose for shoot regeneration of Eclipta alba.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A previous study demonstrated that cell identity regulators control both development and stress response pathways in response to environmental stress (Iyer-Pascuzzi et al, 2011), indicating that stress responses are diverse depending on the cell types of tissues. Because SE formation from the shoot apex can be induced by applying osmotic stress together with 2,4-D treatment in various species besides Arabidopsis, such as carnation, carrot, kidney beans and cucumber (Cabrera-Ponce et al, 2015;Ikeda-Iwai et al, 2003;Karami et al, 2006;Lou and Kako, 1995), cell identity regulators of a specific cell type in the shoot apex might regulate the molecular pathways for the response to this type of stress and for SE formation. As we observed that SEs arose from the regions of LP, we speculate that one possible cell type is LP cells and one possible cell identity regulator is DRN, which is reported to be strongly expressed in the LP of young seedlings, and whose expression was observed to expand all over the SAM region upon SE induction in our study.…”
Section: Stress and Fate Specification Of The Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two categories of inductive conditions which allow differentiated cells to develop into competent dedifferentiated cells are now recognized, these are: plant growth regulators (PGRs) (internal and/or external cellular levels) and stress factors (osmotic shock, culture medium dehydration, water stress, heavy metal ions, alterations of culture medium pH, heat or cool shock treatments, hypoxia, antibiotics, ultraviolet radiation, and mechanical or chemical treatments) (Yu et al 2001;Ikeda-Iwai et al 2003;Aoshima, 2005;Fehér, 2005;Patnaik et al 2005;Karami et al 2006;Begun et al 2007;Potters et al 2007;Lincy et al 2009). There is ample evidence that the PGRs act as central signals to reprogram somatic cells towards embryogenic pathways (Pasternak et al 2002;Fehér et al 2003;Gaj, 2004;Fehér, 2005;Jiménez and Thomas, 2005;Thomas and Jiménez, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%